SPXU vs. RPG
SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXU is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%), while RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXU returned -41.98%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for RPG. At a correlation of -0.90, they often move in opposite directions. SPXU charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.
Performance
SPXU vs. RPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -20.19% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 30.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXU has underperformed RPG with an annualized return of -41.98%, while RPG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.
SPXU
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- -20.19%
- 6M
- -17.81%
- 1Y
- -43.92%
- 3Y*
- -40.85%
- 5Y*
- -33.55%
- 10Y*
- -41.98%
RPG
- 1D
- -4.60%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 30.31%
- 6M
- 27.62%
- 1Y
- 38.51%
- 3Y*
- 27.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
SPXU vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -20.19% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -57.94% | -70.39% | -56.27% | 3.97% | -44.23% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 30.31% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 29.40% | 29.34% | 28.34% | -4.53% | 26.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXU and RPG is -0.84, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009 | -0.90 |
The correlation between SPXU and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.90 to -0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXU vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXU
RPG
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SPXU
RPG
Basic Materials
SPXU
-
RPG
Communication Services
SPXU
-
RPG
Consumer Cyclical
SPXU
-
RPG
Consumer Defensive
SPXU
-
RPG
Energy
SPXU
-
RPG
Healthcare
SPXU
-
RPG
Industrials
SPXU
-
RPG
Real Estate
SPXU
-
RPG
Technology
SPXU
-
RPG
Utilities
SPXU
-
RPG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXU vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank
SPXU
RPG
SPXU vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXU | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.31 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 3.49 | -4.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.61 | 13.16 | -14.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXU vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than RPG's maximum drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and RPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXU | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -53.27% | -46.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.11% | -11.08% | -36.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.36% | -24.75% | -59.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | -35.59% | -54.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.63% | -36.58% | -63.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -4.60% | -95.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.33% | -8.83% | -84.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.37% | 2.93% | +26.44% |
Volatility
SPXU vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) at 11.10%. This indicates that SPXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXU | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.32% | 11.10% | +3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.53% | 19.02% | +10.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 22.09% | +15.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 23.86% | +26.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.43% | 22.90% | +30.53% |
SPXU vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXU has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXU vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison
SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than RPG's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.35% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXU and RPG have a correlation of -0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXU has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to RPG (11.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs RPG's -53.27%.
On 10-year performance, RPG leads with 15.14% vs -41.98% for SPXU. On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RPG has been the lower-risk option at 11.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RPG has performed better with a 15.14% return vs -41.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPXU.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 0.15% for RPG.
SPXU is categorized as S&P 500, while RPG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%), while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SPXU and 0.35% for RPG.
RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXU and RPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer