PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXT vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXT achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXT has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.43%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.50% annualized return.


SPXT

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
4.27%
6M
4.57%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
9.46%
10Y*
11.43%

SCHG

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
2.58%
6M
2.96%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
18.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
4.27%15.10%19.93%16.23%-14.24%26.36%10.44%26.88%-7.06%16.99%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
2.58%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXT and SCHG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.68

The correlation between SPXT and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXT vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXT
SCHG

Financial Services

18.0%
6.7%

Communication Services

17.0%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.9%
12.7%

Healthcare

13.5%
7.7%

Industrials

12.2%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
1.7%

Energy

5.1%
0.8%

Utilities

4.1%
0.4%

Real Estate

2.9%
0.5%

Basic Materials

2.8%
1.4%

Technology

1.0%
46.3%

Financial Services

SPXT
18.0%
SCHG
6.7%

Communication Services

SPXT
17.0%
SCHG
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXT
15.9%
SCHG
12.7%

Healthcare

SPXT
13.5%
SCHG
7.7%

Industrials

SPXT
12.2%
SCHG
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPXT
7.3%
SCHG
1.7%

Energy

SPXT
5.1%
SCHG
0.8%

Utilities

SPXT
4.1%
SCHG
0.4%

Real Estate

SPXT
2.9%
SCHG
0.5%

Basic Materials

SPXT
2.8%
SCHG
1.4%

Technology

SPXT
1.0%
SCHG
46.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXT
SPXT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SPXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXTSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.14

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.70

3.78

+4.92

SPXT vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXT and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXT drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXT and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXTSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.38%

-34.59%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-16.41%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-23.39%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

-34.59%

+13.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.38%

-34.59%

+0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-5.33%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-5.20%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

4.96%

-3.13%

Volatility

SPXT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) is 3.19%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that SPXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXTSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

5.14%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.74%

12.30%

-4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.48%

15.95%

-5.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.74%

22.33%

-7.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

21.58%

-5.34%

SPXT vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SPXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
1.37%1.38%1.29%1.53%1.86%1.15%1.63%1.63%2.03%1.55%2.67%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXT and SCHG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to SPXT (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXT dropped -34.38% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.50% vs 11.43% for SPXT. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPXT has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPXT.

SPXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

SPXT is categorized as S&P 500, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPXT tracks S&P 500 Ex-Information Technology Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXT and 0.04% for SCHG.

SPXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXT and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer