PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXS.MI vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXS.MI vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.MI) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPXS.MI is traded in EUR, while XME is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XME values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXS.MI achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 25.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXS.MI has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 15.17%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 19.72% annualized return.


SPXS.MI

1D
-0.11%
1M
5.27%
YTD
11.42%
6M
11.54%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
14.98%
10Y*
15.17%

XME

1D
-0.05%
1M
8.94%
YTD
25.66%
6M
28.21%
1Y
98.10%
3Y*
36.96%
5Y*
24.76%
10Y*
19.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXS.MI vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXS.MI
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.42%4.51%33.86%22.52%-14.49%41.21%7.76%34.77%-0.95%6.04%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
25.66%61.70%1.76%17.87%20.15%45.02%6.39%17.28%-23.34%6.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXS.MI and XME is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXS.MI vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXS.MI
SPXS.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPXS.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXS.MI vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.MI) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXS.MIXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

4.71

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.16

11.79

+1.37

SPXS.MI vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXS.MI Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the XME Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXS.MI and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXS.MIXMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.94

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.80

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.62

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.18

+0.77

Drawdowns

SPXS.MI vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXS.MI drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -79.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXS.MI and XME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXS.MIXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-79.74%

+46.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-20.92%

+13.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

-32.71%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.10%

-33.29%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.57%

-57.92%

+24.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-3.01%

+2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-36.39%

+32.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

8.35%

-6.39%

Volatility

SPXS.MI vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.MI) is 2.68%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that SPXS.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXS.MIXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

11.67%

-8.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

25.53%

-17.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44%

33.60%

-22.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

31.23%

-16.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

32.07%

-15.76%

SPXS.MI vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXS.MI has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXS.MI vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

SPXS.MI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPXS.MI
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.30%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXS.MI and XME have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXS.MI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXS.MI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XME.

SPXS.MI is categorized as S&P 500, while XME is Materials. SPXS.MI tracks S&P 500 Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXS.MI and 0.35% for XME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXS.MI and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer