Correlation
The correlation between SPXS.MI and CSP1.L is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
SPXS.MI vs. CSP1.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.MI) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L).
SPXS.MI and CSP1.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPXS.MI is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jun 30, 2020. CSP1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 19, 2010. Both SPXS.MI and CSP1.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPXS.MI or CSP1.L.
Performance
SPXS.MI vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
SPXS.MI:
0.45
CSP1.L:
0.44
SPXS.MI:
0.72
CSP1.L:
0.76
SPXS.MI:
1.11
CSP1.L:
1.11
SPXS.MI:
0.37
CSP1.L:
0.38
SPXS.MI:
1.17
CSP1.L:
1.15
SPXS.MI:
7.36%
CSP1.L:
6.93%
SPXS.MI:
18.89%
CSP1.L:
16.51%
SPXS.MI:
-33.57%
CSP1.L:
-25.48%
SPXS.MI:
-11.52%
CSP1.L:
-11.23%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXS.MI achieves a -8.26% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's -7.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXS.MI has underperformed CSP1.L with an annualized return of 12.42%, while CSP1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.92% annualized return.
SPXS.MI
-8.26%
6.96%
-8.62%
9.44%
12.14%
15.56%
12.42%
CSP1.L
-7.12%
2.95%
-7.43%
7.98%
11.57%
13.77%
13.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPXS.MI vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXS.MI has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPXS.MI vs. CSP1.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SPXS.MI
CSP1.L
SPXS.MI vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.MI) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
SPXS.MI vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPXS.MI nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SPXS.MI vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXS.MI drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXS.MI and CSP1.L.
Loading data...
Volatility
SPXS.MI vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.MI) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) have volatilities of 5.83% and 5.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...