PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXN vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXN vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXN achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 10.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPXN having a 16.26% annualized return and SPYM not far behind at 15.62%.


SPXN

1D
-0.59%
1M
6.16%
YTD
13.57%
6M
13.21%
1Y
32.98%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
14.93%
10Y*
16.26%

SPYM

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXN vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
13.57%18.74%24.35%28.57%-18.87%27.04%22.15%31.50%-3.85%20.84%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.98%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXN and SPYM is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015

0.83

The correlation between SPXN and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.98 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXN vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXN
SPYM

Technology

41.1%
38.5%

Communication Services

13.1%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
9.9%

Healthcare

9.9%
8.4%

Industrials

9.6%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
4.6%

Energy

4.1%
3.2%

Utilities

2.7%
2.5%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.7%

Financial Services

-

11.1%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

SPXN
41.1%
SPYM
38.5%

Communication Services

SPXN
13.1%
SPYM
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXN
11.8%
SPYM
9.9%

Healthcare

SPXN
9.9%
SPYM
8.4%

Industrials

SPXN
9.6%
SPYM
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPXN
5.7%
SPYM
4.6%

Energy

SPXN
4.1%
SPYM
3.2%

Utilities

SPXN
2.7%
SPYM
2.5%

Basic Materials

SPXN
2.1%
SPYM
1.7%

Financial Services

SPXN

-

SPYM
11.1%

Real Estate

SPXN

-

SPYM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXN vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXN
SPXN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXN vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXNSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.44

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

3.17

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.43

14.76

+1.67

SPXN vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXN and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXNSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.39

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.83

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.87

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.62

+0.31

Drawdowns

SPXN vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXNSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.10%

-54.46%

+22.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-8.90%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-18.72%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.47%

-24.48%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.10%

-33.87%

+1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.66%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-7.15%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.91%

+0.10%

Volatility

SPXN vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.83%. This indicates that SPXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXNSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

2.83%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

8.90%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

11.80%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

16.80%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

18.00%

-0.36%

SPXN vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXN vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than SPYM's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
0.87%0.98%1.12%1.19%1.35%0.94%1.09%1.41%1.76%1.54%2.60%0.52%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SPXN and SPYM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPXN has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXN dropped -32.10% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPXN leads with 16.26% vs 15.62% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXN has performed better with a 16.26% return vs 15.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPXN.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.87% for SPXN.

SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXN and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXN and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer