SPXN vs. SPDV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPXN (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF) and SPDV (AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXN is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while SPDV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPXN returned 14.93%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for SPDV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXN charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for SPDV.

Performance

SPXN vs. SPDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPXN having a 13.57% return and SPDV slightly higher at 14.19%.

SPXN

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 13.57%
• 6M: 13.21%
• 1Y: 32.98%
• 3Y*: 23.31%
• 5Y*: 14.93%
• 10Y*: 16.26%

SPDV

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 14.19%
• 6M: 14.91%
• 1Y: 27.39%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXN vs. SPDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF	13.57%	18.74%	24.35%	28.57%	-18.87%	27.04%	22.15%	31.50%	-3.85%	3.84%
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF	14.19%	10.90%	14.40%	5.45%	-2.27%	29.54%	-6.09%	20.46%	-6.59%	3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXN and SPDV is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017	0.61

The correlation between SPXN and SPDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXN vs. SPDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPXN	SPDV
Technology	41.1%	11.1%
Communication Services	13.1%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	13.5%
Healthcare	9.9%	9.7%
Industrials	9.6%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	9.1%
Energy	4.1%	12.3%
Utilities	2.7%	5.8%
Basic Materials	2.1%	5.1%
Financial Services	-	9.2%
Real Estate	-	8.7%

Return for Risk

SPXN vs. SPDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXN

SPXN Risk / Return Rank: 78
SPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
SPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
SPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

SPDV

SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 73
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXN vs. SPDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPXN	SPDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.26	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.35	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.40	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.58	4.74	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.43	13.66	+2.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPXN vs. SPDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the SPDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXN and SPDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPXN	SPDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	2.26	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.50	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.46	+0.47

Drawdowns

SPXN vs. SPDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum SPDV drawdown of -43.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and SPDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPXN	SPDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.10%	-43.81%	+11.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.26%	-5.80%	-3.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.56%	-18.62%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.47%	-21.31%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-0.62%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-6.57%	+2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	2.01%	0.00%

Volatility

SPXN vs. SPDV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) at 2.76%. This indicates that SPXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPXN	SPDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.16%	2.76%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.69%	8.16%	+1.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.70%	12.18%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.16%	16.30%	+0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.64%	20.31%	-2.67%

SPXN vs. SPDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SPDV's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPXN vs. SPDV - Dividend Comparison

SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than SPDV's 3.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF	3.31%	3.85%	3.54%	3.95%	3.73%	3.08%	3.90%	3.54%	3.63%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF	0.87%	0.98%	1.12%	1.19%	1.35%	0.94%	1.09%	1.41%	1.76%	1.54%	2.60%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPXN and SPDV in my portfolio?

SPXN and SPDV have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPXN or SPDV?

SPXN has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to SPDV (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXN dropped -32.10% vs SPDV's -43.81%.

Which ETF is better, SPXN or SPDV?

On 5-year performance, SPXN leads with 14.93% vs 8.17% for SPDV. On fees, SPXN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPXN or SPDV?

Over the 5-year period, SPXN has performed better with a 14.93% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPXN or SPDV?

SPXN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SPDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPXN or SPDV?

SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 0.87% for SPXN.

What is the main difference between SPXN and SPDV?

SPXN is categorized as S&P 500, while SPDV is Dividend. SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Advisors Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXN and 0.29% for SPDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.