SPXN vs. RSPG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG).

SPXN and RSPG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPXN is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Ex-Financials Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2015. RSPG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. Both SPXN and RSPG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SPXN vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SPXN vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF	-3.95%	18.74%	24.35%	28.57%	-18.87%	27.04%	22.15%	31.50%	-3.85%	20.84%
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	38.21%	7.01%	6.09%	4.49%	57.97%	57.73%	-32.44%	13.38%	-24.68%	-6.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXN achieves a -3.95% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 38.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXN has outperformed RSPG with an annualized return of 14.97%, while RSPG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.62% annualized return.

SPXN

• 1D: 2.93%
• 1M: -5.17%
• YTD: -3.95%
• 6M: -1.11%
• 1Y: 20.91%
• 3Y*: 18.58%
• 5Y*: 12.14%
• 10Y*: 14.97%

RSPG

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 10.24%
• YTD: 38.21%
• 6M: 39.08%
• 1Y: 37.07%
• 3Y*: 20.00%
• 5Y*: 24.76%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXN vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXN has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.

RSPG

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF

SPXN

ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF

Return for Risk

SPXN vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXN

SPXN Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
SPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 78

RSPG

RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 70
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXN vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPXN	RSPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	1.36	-0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	1.76	-0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.27	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	1.83	-0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.30	5.12	+3.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPXN vs. RSPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the RSPG Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXN and RSPG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPXN	RSPG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	1.36	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.87	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	0.35	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.19	+0.64

Correlation

The correlation between SPXN and RSPG is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SPXN vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison

SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than RSPG's 1.89% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF	1.03%	0.98%	1.12%	1.19%	1.35%	0.94%	1.09%	1.41%	1.76%	1.54%	2.60%	0.52%
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	1.89%	2.60%	2.43%	2.84%	3.43%	2.37%	3.15%	2.15%	2.18%	2.55%	1.14%	2.80%

Drawdowns

SPXN vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and RSPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPXN	RSPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.10%	-79.98%	+47.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.23%	-21.05%	+8.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.47%	-28.44%	+3.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.10%	-73.17%	+41.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.60%	-2.90%	-3.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.05%	-25.63%	+21.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	7.54%	-4.96%

Volatility

SPXN vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) at 5.25%. This indicates that SPXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPXN	RSPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.79%	5.25%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.30%	14.93%	-4.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.98%	27.50%	-8.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.16%	28.52%	-11.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.69%	33.57%	-15.88%