PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXM vs. FTAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXM vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
8.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.63%

FTAG

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.29%
6M
2.71%
YTD
11.34%
1Y
13.00%
3Y*
3.12%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*
5.38%
ALL TIME*
-8.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$83.54K$68.71K$180.75K
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SPXM vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPXM and FTAG is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXM vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPXM
SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FTAG
FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPXM vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXMFTAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.17

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.37

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.12

3.00

+7.12

SPXM vs. FTAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXM Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the FTAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXM and FTAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXM vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXM drawdown since its inception was -5.08%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXM and FTAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXMFTAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-90.89%

+85.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.08%

-9.56%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-78.47%

+77.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-71.30%

+70.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

Volatility

SPXM vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) is 0.00%, while First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that SPXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXMFTAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

3.64%

-3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.22%

11.24%

-10.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.38%

14.28%

-6.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.39%

17.42%

-10.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.39%

19.45%

-12.06%

SPXM vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXM has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXM vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison

SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than FTAG's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
1.31%1.39%2.89%3.68%1.77%1.58%1.72%2.33%2.16%1.26%0.61%1.35%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXM and FTAG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTAG has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXM dropped -5.08% vs FTAG's -90.89%.

On 1-year performance, FTAG leads with 13.00% vs 8.90% for SPXM. On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTAG has performed better with a 13.00% return vs 8.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.

FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

They also come from different issuers: Azoria and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SPXM and 0.70% for FTAG.

SPXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXM and FTAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer