PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAG vs. PSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTAG vs. PSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAG achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly higher than PSMD's 6.35% return.


FTAG

1D
-2.10%
1M
-1.11%
6M
3.82%
YTD
11.55%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
2.62%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
5.40%
ALL TIME*
-8.10%

PSMD

1D
0.30%
1M
0.61%
6M
5.65%
YTD
6.35%
1Y
12.94%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$71.78K$63.89K$178.26K
$12.30K$15.12K$38.33K

FTAG vs. PSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
11.55%14.82%-6.72%-7.28%-4.52%17.31%1.72%
PSMD
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF
6.35%11.45%12.78%17.46%-4.47%11.23%0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAG and PSMD is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2020

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between FTAG and PSMD has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTAG vs. PSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTAG
PSMD

Basic Materials

52.5%
1.7%

Industrials

25.4%
8.4%

Healthcare

10.0%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
9.5%

Communication Services

-

9.9%

Energy

-

3.0%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

38.5%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Basic Materials

FTAG
52.5%
PSMD
1.7%

Industrials

FTAG
25.4%
PSMD
8.4%

Healthcare

FTAG
10.0%
PSMD
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

FTAG
7.6%
PSMD
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FTAG
4.5%
PSMD
9.5%

Communication Services

FTAG

-

PSMD
9.9%

Energy

FTAG

-

PSMD
3.0%

Financial Services

FTAG

-

PSMD
11.6%

Real Estate

FTAG

-

PSMD
1.8%

Technology

FTAG

-

PSMD
38.5%

Utilities

FTAG

-

PSMD
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAG vs. PSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTAG
FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PSMD
PSMD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTAG vs. PSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTAGPSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.42

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

2.75

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

14.24

-11.51

FTAG vs. PSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the PSMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAG and PSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTAG vs. PSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAG drawdown since its inception was -90.89%, which is greater than PSMD's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAG and PSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAGPSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.89%

-11.96%

-78.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-4.42%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

-10.70%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.77%

-11.96%

-20.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.42%

0.00%

-78.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.30%

-1.62%

-69.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

0.85%

+3.48%

Volatility

FTAG vs. PSMD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) at 1.44%. This indicates that FTAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAGPSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

1.44%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.27%

4.83%

+6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

5.85%

+8.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

8.65%

+8.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

8.42%

+11.02%

FTAG vs. PSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than PSMD's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTAG vs. PSMD - Dividend Comparison

FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while PSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
1.30%1.39%2.89%3.68%1.77%1.58%1.72%2.33%2.16%1.26%0.61%1.35%
PSMD
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTAG and PSMD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTAG has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to PSMD (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAG dropped -90.89% vs PSMD's -11.96%.

On 5-year performance, PSMD leads with 9.18% vs 1.86% for FTAG. On fees, FTAG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, PSMD has been the lower-risk option at 1.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PSMD has performed better with a 9.18% return vs 1.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTAG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSMD.

FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for PSMD.

FTAG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PSMD is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTAG and 0.75% for PSMD.

PSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAG and PSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer