SPXM vs. BAMU
SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Azoria, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. SPXM charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.
Performance
SPXM vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAMU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.16% |
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 1.06% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXM and BAMU is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXM vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank
SPXM
BAMU
SPXM vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXM | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.56 | 4.14 | -2.58 |
Drawdowns
SPXM vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXM drawdown since its inception was -5.08%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXM and BAMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXM | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -0.36% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | 0.00% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -0.02% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.03% | — |
Volatility
SPXM vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXM | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.18% | 0.59% | +7.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.18% | 0.87% | +7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.18% | 0.87% | +7.31% |
SPXM vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXM has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXM vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison
SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than BAMU's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 3.06% | 3.20% | 3.97% | 0.84% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXM and BAMU have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.
BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.
SPXM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Azoria and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SPXM and 1.09% for BAMU.
Find the right allocation for SPXM and BAMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer