SPXL vs. UMDD
SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SPXL tracks the S&P 500 while UMDD tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXL returned 28.12%/yr vs 10.70%/yr for UMDD. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UMDD.
Performance
SPXL vs. UMDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 20.43% return, which is significantly lower than UMDD's 34.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXL has outperformed UMDD with an annualized return of 28.12%, while UMDD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.70% annualized return.
SPXL
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -2.78%
- 6M
- 16.06%
- YTD
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 47.42%
- 3Y*
- 42.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 28.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 27.27%
UMDD
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- YTD
- 34.48%
- 1Y
- 43.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.19%
SPXL vs. UMDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 20.43% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 69.49% | -56.55% | 98.75% | 9.64% | 102.80% | -25.11% | 71.03% |
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 34.48% | -2.57% | 19.68% | 27.21% | -49.60% | 72.27% | -17.30% | 78.90% | -40.29% | 49.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXL and UMDD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SPXL and UMDD shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPXL vs. UMDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXL
UMDD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPXL
UMDD
Financial Services
SPXL
UMDD
Communication Services
SPXL
UMDD
Consumer Cyclical
SPXL
UMDD
Healthcare
SPXL
UMDD
Industrials
SPXL
UMDD
Consumer Defensive
SPXL
UMDD
Energy
SPXL
UMDD
Utilities
SPXL
UMDD
Real Estate
SPXL
UMDD
Basic Materials
SPXL
UMDD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXL vs. UMDD — Risk / Return Rank
SPXL
UMDD
SPXL vs. UMDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXL | UMDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.69 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.99 | 5.59 | +1.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXL vs. UMDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, smaller than the maximum UMDD drawdown of -86.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and UMDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXL | UMDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -86.24% | +9.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -26.04% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.95% | -60.33% | +11.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.80% | -64.61% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | -86.24% | +9.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.98% | -8.63% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -23.47% | +7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | 7.86% | -1.06% |
Volatility
SPXL vs. UMDD - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) have volatilities of 10.42% and 10.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXL | UMDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.42% | 10.26% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.23% | 35.21% | -4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.86% | 47.26% | -9.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.54% | 58.70% | -8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.41% | 62.09% | -8.68% |
SPXL vs. UMDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than UMDD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXL vs. UMDD - Dividend Comparison
SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than UMDD's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.54% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 0.69% | 1.00% | 0.76% | 0.19% | 0.49% | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.64% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXL and UMDD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXL has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to UMDD (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXL dropped -76.86% vs UMDD's -86.24%.
On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 28.12% vs 10.70% for UMDD. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 10.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 28.12% return vs 10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UMDD.
UMDD has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.54% for SPXL.
SPXL tracks S&P 500, while UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.95% for UMDD.
SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXL and UMDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer