SPXL vs. LINT
SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. SPXL is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
SPXL vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 27.32% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.
SPXL
- 1D
- 4.28%
- 1M
- 4.04%
- 6M
- 21.44%
- YTD
- 27.32%
- 1Y
- 61.16%
- 3Y*
- 46.76%
- 5Y*
- 20.51%
- 10Y*
- 28.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 27.60%
LINT
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -46.62%
- 6M
- 135.02%
- YTD
- 266.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.84M | $20.02M | $35.16M | |
| $489.09M | $455.54M | $538.26M |
SPXL vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 27.32% | 9.33% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 266.23% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXL and LINT is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.48 |
SPXL vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXL
LINT
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPXL
LINT
Financial Services
SPXL
LINT
-
Communication Services
SPXL
LINT
-
Healthcare
SPXL
LINT
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPXL
LINT
-
Industrials
SPXL
LINT
-
Consumer Defensive
SPXL
LINT
-
Energy
SPXL
LINT
-
Utilities
SPXL
LINT
-
Real Estate
SPXL
LINT
-
Basic Materials
SPXL
LINT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXL vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank
SPXL
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXL vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXL | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXL vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXL | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -69.02% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -62.23% | +59.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.04% | -24.07% | +8.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | — | — |
Volatility
SPXL vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXL | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.54% | 169.02% | -130.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.67% | 169.02% | -118.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.49% | 169.02% | -115.53% |
SPXL vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXL vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than LINT's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.74% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.51% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXL and LINT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.51% for SPXL.
Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for SPXL and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer