SPXL vs. EEM
SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXL returned 29.90%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for EEM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.
Performance
SPXL vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 20.98% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 24.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXL has outperformed EEM with an annualized return of 29.90%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.
SPXL
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- 65.66%
- 3Y*
- 47.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.80%
- 10Y*
- 29.90%
EEM
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 24.07%
- 6M
- 26.94%
- 1Y
- 45.22%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
SPXL vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 20.98% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 69.49% | -56.55% | 98.75% | 9.64% | 102.80% | -25.11% | 71.03% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 24.07% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXL and EEM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2008 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SPXL and EEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (5 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPXL vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXL
EEM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPXL
EEM
Financial Services
SPXL
EEM
Communication Services
SPXL
EEM
Consumer Cyclical
SPXL
EEM
Healthcare
SPXL
EEM
Industrials
SPXL
EEM
Consumer Defensive
SPXL
EEM
Energy
SPXL
EEM
Utilities
SPXL
EEM
Real Estate
SPXL
EEM
Basic Materials
SPXL
EEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXL vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
SPXL
EEM
SPXL vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXL | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.40 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 3.36 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | 12.38 | -2.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXL vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than EEM's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and EEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXL | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -66.43% | -10.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -13.52% | -13.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.95% | -17.29% | -31.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.80% | -37.49% | -26.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | -39.82% | -37.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -4.12% | -3.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -16.00% | -0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.49% | 3.67% | +2.82% |
Volatility
SPXL vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) has a higher volatility of 13.20% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) at 10.80%. This indicates that SPXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXL | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.20% | 10.80% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.79% | 19.39% | +9.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.81% | 21.64% | +15.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.44% | 19.26% | +31.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.50% | 20.64% | +32.86% |
SPXL vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXL vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than EEM's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.79% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.56% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXL and EEM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXL has higher volatility (13.20%) compared to EEM (10.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXL dropped -76.86% vs EEM's -66.43%.
On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 29.90% vs 9.91% for EEM. On fees, EEM is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, EEM has been the lower-risk option at 10.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 29.90% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEM is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for SPXL.
EEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.56% for SPXL.
SPXL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. SPXL tracks S&P 500, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.72% for EEM.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXL and EEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer