PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXL vs. EEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXL vs. EEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 20.98% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 24.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXL has outperformed EEM with an annualized return of 29.90%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.


SPXL

1D
1.54%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
20.98%
6M
21.36%
1Y
65.66%
3Y*
47.11%
5Y*
21.80%
10Y*
29.90%

EEM

1D
0.56%
1M
1.00%
YTD
24.07%
6M
26.94%
1Y
45.22%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXL vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
20.98%31.94%63.61%69.49%-56.55%98.75%9.64%102.80%-25.11%71.03%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
24.07%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXL and EEM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2008

0.74

The correlation between SPXL and EEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (5 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXL vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXL
EEM

Technology

8.4%
43.6%

Financial Services

2.4%
17.5%

Communication Services

2.3%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
8.1%

Healthcare

1.8%
2.5%

Industrials

1.7%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
2.7%

Energy

0.7%
3.3%

Utilities

0.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.9%

Basic Materials

0.4%
6.1%

Technology

SPXL
8.4%
EEM
43.6%

Financial Services

SPXL
2.4%
EEM
17.5%

Communication Services

SPXL
2.3%
EEM
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXL
2.2%
EEM
8.1%

Healthcare

SPXL
1.8%
EEM
2.5%

Industrials

SPXL
1.7%
EEM
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPXL
1.0%
EEM
2.7%

Energy

SPXL
0.7%
EEM
3.3%

Utilities

SPXL
0.6%
EEM
2.0%

Real Estate

SPXL
0.4%
EEM
0.9%

Basic Materials

SPXL
0.4%
EEM
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXL vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXL
SPXL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXL Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXL Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXL vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXLEEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.36

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.16

12.38

-2.23

SPXL vs. EEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXL Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the EEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXL and EEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXL vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than EEM's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and EEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXLEEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.86%

-66.43%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.77%

-13.52%

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.95%

-17.29%

-31.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.80%

-37.49%

-26.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.86%

-39.82%

-37.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.55%

-4.12%

-3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.11%

-16.00%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.49%

3.67%

+2.82%

Volatility

SPXL vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) has a higher volatility of 13.20% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) at 10.80%. This indicates that SPXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXLEEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.20%

10.80%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.79%

19.39%

+9.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.81%

21.64%

+15.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.44%

19.26%

+31.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.50%

20.64%

+32.86%

SPXL vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXL vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison

SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than EEM's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.79%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
0.56%0.69%0.74%0.98%0.32%0.11%0.22%0.84%1.02%3.88%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXL and EEM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPXL has higher volatility (13.20%) compared to EEM (10.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXL dropped -76.86% vs EEM's -66.43%.

On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 29.90% vs 9.91% for EEM. On fees, EEM is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, EEM has been the lower-risk option at 10.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 29.90% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEM is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for SPXL.

EEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.56% for SPXL.

SPXL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. SPXL tracks S&P 500, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.72% for EEM.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXL and EEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer