SPXL vs. CIFG
SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SPXL is passively managed, while CIFG is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.
Performance
SPXL vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's 96.56% return.
SPXL
- 1D
- -4.48%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- 17.21%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- 1Y
- 62.56%
- 3Y*
- 46.39%
- 5Y*
- 20.70%
- 10Y*
- 30.27%
CIFG
- 1D
- -3.87%
- 1M
- 42.24%
- YTD
- 96.56%
- 6M
- 67.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXL vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 17.21% | -2.30% |
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 96.56% | -32.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXL and CIFG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXL vs. CIFG — Risk / Return Rank
SPXL
CIFG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXL vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXL | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXL vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than CIFG's maximum drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and CIFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXL | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -71.71% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.44% | -10.44% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -35.54% | +19.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.56% | — | — |
Volatility
SPXL vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXL | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.43% | 205.93% | -168.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.54% | 205.93% | -155.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.47% | 205.93% | -152.46% |
SPXL vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXL vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison
SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while CIFG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.57% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXL and CIFG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for CIFG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.75% for CIFG.
Find the right allocation for SPXL and CIFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer