SPXL vs. BULZ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and BULZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SPXL tracks the S&P 500 while BULZ tracks the Solactive FANG Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPXL returned 47.11%/yr vs 77.02%/yr for BULZ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BULZ.

Performance

SPXL vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 20.98% return, which is significantly lower than BULZ's 54.96% return.

SPXL

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 20.98%
• 6M: 21.36%
• 1Y: 65.66%
• 3Y*: 47.11%
• 5Y*: 21.80%
• 10Y*: 29.90%

BULZ

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -11.00%
• YTD: 54.96%
• 6M: 57.61%
• 1Y: 163.08%
• 3Y*: 77.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXL vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF	20.98%	31.94%	63.61%	69.49%	-56.55%	21.51%
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	54.96%	60.09%	54.09%	394.22%	-92.26%	9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXL and BULZ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2021	0.87

The correlation between SPXL and BULZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPXL vs. BULZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPXL	BULZ
Technology	8.4%	62.3%
Financial Services	2.4%	-
Communication Services	2.3%	25.0%
Consumer Cyclical	2.2%	12.8%
Healthcare	1.8%	-
Industrials	1.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	-
Energy	0.7%	-
Utilities	0.6%	-
Real Estate	0.4%	-
Basic Materials	0.4%	-

Return for Risk

SPXL vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXL

SPXL Risk / Return Rank: 58
SPXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SPXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
SPXL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SPXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SPXL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 63
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXL vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPXL	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.12	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.36	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.32	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	3.03	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.16	7.94	+2.21

SPXL vs. BULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXL Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the BULZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXL and BULZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPXL vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and BULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPXL	BULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.86%	-94.44%	+17.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.77%	-54.22%	+27.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.95%	-67.96%	+19.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.55%	-26.99%	+19.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.11%	-58.18%	+42.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.49%	20.62%	-14.13%

Volatility

SPXL vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) is 13.20%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a volatility of 30.02%. This indicates that SPXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPXL	BULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.20%	30.02%	-16.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.79%	61.86%	-33.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.81%	77.55%	-40.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.44%	91.54%	-41.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.50%	91.54%	-38.04%

SPXL vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPXL vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison

SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF	0.56%	0.69%	0.74%	0.98%	0.32%	0.11%	0.22%	0.84%	1.02%	3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPXL and BULZ in my portfolio?

SPXL and BULZ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPXL or BULZ?

BULZ has higher volatility (30.02%) compared to SPXL (13.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXL dropped -76.86% vs BULZ's -94.44%.

Which ETF is better, SPXL or BULZ?

On 3-year performance, BULZ leads with 77.02% vs 47.11% for SPXL. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, SPXL has been the lower-risk option at 13.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPXL or BULZ?

Over the 3-year period, BULZ has performed better with a 77.02% return vs 47.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPXL or BULZ?

SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BULZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPXL or BULZ?

SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for BULZ.

What is the main difference between SPXL and BULZ?

SPXL tracks S&P 500, while BULZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.95% for BULZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.