SPXD vs. USCA
SPXD (Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF) and USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index, while USCA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXD charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for USCA.
Performance
SPXD vs. USCA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXD achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than USCA's 2.75% return.
SPXD
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USCA
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 13.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXD vs. USCA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF | 10.76% | 4.54% |
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF | 2.75% | 5.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXD and USCA is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXD vs. USCA — Risk / Return Rank
SPXD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USCA
SPXD vs. USCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXD | USCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXD vs. USCA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXD drawdown since its inception was -7.53%, smaller than the maximum USCA drawdown of -19.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXD and USCA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXD | USCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.53% | -19.14% | +11.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -4.80% | +4.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.21% | -2.18% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.70% | — |
Volatility
SPXD vs. USCA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXD | USCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.84% | 12.58% | -1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.84% | 14.83% | -3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.84% | 14.83% | -3.99% |
SPXD vs. USCA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXD has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than USCA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXD vs. USCA - Dividend Comparison
SPXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than USCA's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF | 1.40% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.22% | 1.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXD and USCA have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPXD.
SPXD has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 1.16% for USCA.
SPXD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while USCA is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPXD tracks S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index, while USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXD and 0.07% for USCA.
Find the right allocation for SPXD and USCA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer