SPXD vs. ROE

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SPXD (Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF) and ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. SPXD is passively managed, while ROE is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXD charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ROE.

Performance

SPXD vs. ROE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXD achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 18.76% return.

SPXD

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 0.84%
• 6M: 7.92%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ROE

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -1.54%
• 6M: 13.74%
• YTD: 18.76%
• 1Y: 31.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXD vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF	12.18%	4.54%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	18.76%	8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXD and ROE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

SPXD vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ROE

ROE Risk / Return Rank: 83
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXD vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPXD	ROE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.13	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.86	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.66	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.88	—

Drawdowns

SPXD vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXD drawdown since its inception was -7.53%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXD and ROE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPXD	ROE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.53%	-19.10%	+11.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-2.60%	+2.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.16%	-2.54%	+1.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPXD	ROE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.77%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.69%	14.91%	-4.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.69%	15.92%	-5.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.69%	15.92%	-5.23%

SPXD vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXD has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPXD vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison

SPXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than ROE's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	1.02%	0.97%	1.18%	0.68%
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF	1.39%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPXD and ROE in my portfolio?

SPXD and ROE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPXD or ROE?

On fees, SPXD is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPXD or ROE?

SPXD is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ROE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPXD or ROE?

SPXD has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.02% for ROE.

What is the main difference between SPXD and ROE?

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXD and 0.49% for ROE.