PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXD vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXD vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXD achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 15.35% return.


SPXD

1D
0.59%
1M
3.15%
YTD
10.08%
6M
10.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FNDX

1D
0.68%
1M
3.54%
YTD
15.35%
6M
15.57%
1Y
33.72%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXD vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPXD and FNDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXD vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXD

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXD vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPXD vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXDFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.80

+0.91

Drawdowns

SPXD vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXD drawdown since its inception was -7.53%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXD and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXDFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-37.72%

+30.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-3.55%

+2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

Volatility

SPXD vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXDFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

10.22%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.78%

15.18%

-4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.78%

17.50%

-6.72%

SPXD vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXD has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXD vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

SPXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than FNDX's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.44%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%
SPXD
Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF
1.02%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SPXD and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPXD is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXD is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.02% for SPXD.

SPXD tracks S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXD and 0.25% for FNDX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXD and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer