SPXD vs. FNDX
SPXD (Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - SPXD tracks the S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index while FNDX tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPXD charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
SPXD vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXD achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 15.35% return.
SPXD
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 15.35%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- 33.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
SPXD vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF | 10.08% | 5.02% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 15.35% | 9.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXD and FNDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXD vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
SPXD
FNDX
SPXD vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXD | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.70 | 0.80 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
SPXD vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXD drawdown since its inception was -7.53%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXD and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXD | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.53% | -37.72% | +30.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -3.55% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
SPXD vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXD | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 10.22% | +0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 15.18% | -4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 17.50% | -6.72% |
SPXD vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXD has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXD vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
SPXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than FNDX's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF | 1.02% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SPXD and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPXD is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXD is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.02% for SPXD.
SPXD tracks S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXD and 0.25% for FNDX.
Find the right allocation for SPXD and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer