SPX4.L vs. DH2O.L
SPX4.L (SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF) and DH2O.L (iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - SPX4.L is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Mid Cap TR USD, while DH2O.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water Index (NET) (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPX4.L returned 7.27%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for DH2O.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPX4.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DH2O.L.
Performance
SPX4.L vs. DH2O.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPX4.L is traded in GBP, while DH2O.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DH2O.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPX4.L achieves a 14.27% return, which is significantly higher than DH2O.L's 4.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SPX4.L has underperformed DH2O.L with an annualized return of 7.27%, while DH2O.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.49% annualized return.
SPX4.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- YTD
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 20.65%
- 3Y*
- 11.74%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.27%
DH2O.L
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 8.17%
- 5Y*
- 5.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
SPX4.L vs. DH2O.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPX4.L SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF | 14.27% | 0.12% | 14.37% | 10.71% | -28.36% | 24.10% | 12.97% | 25.47% | -11.60% | 15.60% |
DH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.52% | 9.23% | 6.11% | 7.89% | -11.42% | 31.91% | 11.83% | 28.52% | -5.29% | 16.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPX4.L and DH2O.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2012 | 0.49 |
The correlation between SPX4.L and DH2O.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.65 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPX4.L vs. DH2O.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPX4.L
DH2O.L
SPX4.L vs. DH2O.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPX4.L | DH2O.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.10 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 0.71 | +2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.93 | 1.72 | +8.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPX4.L vs. DH2O.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPX4.L drawdown since its inception was -42.03%, which is greater than DH2O.L's maximum drawdown of -37.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPX4.L and DH2O.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPX4.L | DH2O.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.03% | -37.91% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -10.33% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.24% | -14.14% | -12.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.77% | -23.57% | -14.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.03% | -27.84% | -14.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -3.43% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -6.01% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 4.24% | -2.15% |
Volatility
SPX4.L vs. DH2O.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) is 4.48%, while iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that SPX4.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DH2O.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPX4.L | DH2O.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 5.04% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.36% | 11.16% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.75% | 13.69% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 15.19% | +5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 15.74% | +5.61% |
SPX4.L vs. DH2O.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPX4.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DH2O.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPX4.L vs. DH2O.L - Dividend Comparison
SPX4.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.34% | 1.33% | 1.06% | 1.18% | 1.09% | 1.66% | 0.94% | 1.39% | 1.80% | 1.46% | 1.76% | 1.65% |
SPX4.L SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPX4.L and DH2O.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPX4.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPX4.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DH2O.L.
SPX4.L is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while DH2O.L is Global Equities. SPX4.L tracks Russell Mid Cap TR USD, while DH2O.L tracks S&P Global Water Index (NET) (USD). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SPX4.L and 0.65% for DH2O.L.
Find the right allocation for SPX4.L and DH2O.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer