PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DH2O.L vs. AQWA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L) and Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc (AQWA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DH2O.L achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly higher than AQWA.L's 3.41% return.


DH2O.L

1D
0.08%
1M
4.00%
6M
1.18%
YTD
4.37%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
9.31%
5Y*
5.15%
10Y*
9.79%

AQWA.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.58%
6M
-1.03%
YTD
3.41%
1Y
4.17%
3Y*
10.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DH2O.L
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.37%17.60%4.29%13.57%-20.83%3.51%
AQWA.L
Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc
3.41%12.96%5.98%25.16%-19.37%1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between DH2O.L and AQWA.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2021

0.88

The correlation between DH2O.L and AQWA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DH2O.L vs. AQWA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DH2O.L
DH2O.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DH2O.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

AQWA.L
AQWA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AQWA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQWA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQWA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AQWA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQWA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L) and Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc (AQWA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DH2O.LAQWA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.06

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

0.35

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

0.75

+0.91

DH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DH2O.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the AQWA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DH2O.L and AQWA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DH2O.L drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, which is greater than AQWA.L's maximum drawdown of -28.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DH2O.L and AQWA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DH2O.LAQWA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-28.61%

-28.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-11.86%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.08%

-17.35%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

-6.22%

+2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-9.24%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

5.57%

-0.99%

Volatility

DH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L) and Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc (AQWA.L) have volatilities of 4.28% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DH2O.LAQWA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

4.42%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.90%

11.75%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.64%

14.88%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

17.33%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

17.33%

-0.85%

DH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DH2O.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AQWA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Dividend Comparison

DH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, while AQWA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQWA.L
Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DH2O.L
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.34%1.33%1.06%1.18%1.09%1.66%0.94%1.39%1.80%1.46%1.76%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


DH2O.L and AQWA.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AQWA.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AQWA.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DH2O.L.

DH2O.L is categorized as Global Equities, while AQWA.L is Water Equities. DH2O.L tracks S&P Global Water Index (NET) (USD), while AQWA.L tracks Solactive Global Clean Water Industry v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DH2O.L and 0.50% for AQWA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DH2O.L and AQWA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer