SPWO vs. MNZL
SPWO (SP Funds S&P World ETF) and MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPWO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the S&P DM Ex-U.S. & EM 50/50 Shariah Index - Benchmark TR Net, while MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPWO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MNZL.
Performance
SPWO vs. MNZL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPWO achieves a 26.98% return, which is significantly higher than MNZL's 18.20% return.
SPWO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 8.23%
- YTD
- 26.98%
- 6M
- 27.41%
- 1Y
- 47.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNZL
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 8.16%
- YTD
- 18.20%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPWO vs. MNZL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPWO SP Funds S&P World ETF | 26.98% | 4.34% |
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 18.20% | 2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPWO and MNZL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPWO vs. MNZL — Risk / Return Rank
SPWO
MNZL
SPWO vs. MNZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P World ETF (SPWO) and Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPWO | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.22 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPWO | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 2.84 | -1.40 |
Drawdowns
SPWO vs. MNZL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPWO drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, which is greater than MNZL's maximum drawdown of -9.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPWO and MNZL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPWO | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -9.66% | -8.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -1.04% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -1.74% | -1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | — | — |
Volatility
SPWO vs. MNZL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPWO | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.64% | 15.73% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 15.73% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 15.73% | +3.29% |
SPWO vs. MNZL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPWO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MNZL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPWO vs. MNZL - Dividend Comparison
SPWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than MNZL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% |
SPWO SP Funds S&P World ETF | 1.02% | 1.29% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPWO and MNZL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MNZL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNZL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPWO.
SPWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
SPWO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MNZL is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPWO tracks S&P DM Ex-U.S. & EM 50/50 Shariah Index - Benchmark TR Net, while MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and Manzil. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPWO and 0.40% for MNZL.
Find the right allocation for SPWO and MNZL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer