SPVM vs. ULVM
SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) and ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - SPVM tracks the S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index while ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPVM returned 10.09%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for ULVM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPVM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ULVM.
Performance
SPVM vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPVM achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than ULVM's 14.84% return.
SPVM
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 19.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
ULVM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
SPVM vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 8.29% | 20.47% | 15.64% | 5.53% | -2.10% | 28.86% | -3.18% | 29.33% | -9.17% | 2.22% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.84% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPVM and ULVM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SPVM and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPVM vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPVM
ULVM
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
SPVM
ULVM
Utilities
SPVM
ULVM
Energy
SPVM
ULVM
Communication Services
SPVM
ULVM
Consumer Cyclical
SPVM
ULVM
Healthcare
SPVM
ULVM
Technology
SPVM
ULVM
Consumer Defensive
SPVM
ULVM
Industrials
SPVM
ULVM
Real Estate
SPVM
ULVM
Basic Materials
SPVM
ULVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPVM vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank
SPVM
ULVM
SPVM vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPVM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 4.50 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | 18.64 | -2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPVM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.71 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.74 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.58 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
SPVM vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPVM drawdown since its inception was -45.35%, which is greater than ULVM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPVM and ULVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPVM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.35% | -40.71% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -6.47% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.66% | -18.14% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.48% | -19.77% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -0.13% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -5.75% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 1.56% | +0.16% |
Volatility
SPVM vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) is 2.79%, while VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that SPVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPVM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 2.96% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.48% | 7.97% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.63% | 10.74% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 15.48% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 18.86% | +0.71% |
SPVM vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPVM vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison
SPVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than ULVM's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 1.91% | 2.02% | 1.91% | 2.45% | 2.33% | 1.41% | 2.11% | 2.40% | 3.10% | 1.68% | 2.80% | 2.67% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPVM and ULVM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ULVM has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to SPVM (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPVM dropped -45.35% vs ULVM's -40.71%.
On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 10.09% for SPVM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 10.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.
SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.58% for ULVM.
SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SPVM and 0.20% for ULVM.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPVM and ULVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer