PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPVM vs. SPHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPVM vs. SPHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPVM achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than SPHB's 29.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SPVM has underperformed SPHB with an annualized return of 12.34%, while SPHB has yielded a comparatively higher 19.46% annualized return.


SPVM

1D
0.76%
1M
2.61%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.00%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*
12.34%

SPHB

1D
-4.02%
1M
6.10%
YTD
29.05%
6M
26.31%
1Y
62.78%
3Y*
28.21%
5Y*
15.53%
10Y*
19.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPVM vs. SPHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
9.93%20.47%15.64%5.53%-2.10%28.86%-3.18%29.33%-9.17%14.70%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
29.05%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-15.55%17.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SPVM and SPHB is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2011

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between SPVM and SPHB has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPVM vs. SPHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPVM
SPHB

Financial Services

36.0%
13.2%

Utilities

13.8%
2.4%

Energy

8.6%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
12.7%

Communication Services

6.6%
2.5%

Technology

6.2%
46.2%

Healthcare

6.2%
4.9%

Industrials

4.5%
14.8%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Financial Services

SPVM
36.0%
SPHB
13.2%

Utilities

SPVM
13.8%
SPHB
2.4%

Energy

SPVM
8.6%
SPHB
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPVM
7.6%
SPHB
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPVM
6.8%
SPHB
12.7%

Communication Services

SPVM
6.6%
SPHB
2.5%

Technology

SPVM
6.2%
SPHB
46.2%

Healthcare

SPVM
6.2%
SPHB
4.9%

Industrials

SPVM
4.5%
SPHB
14.8%

Basic Materials

SPVM
1.9%
SPHB
2.4%

Real Estate

SPVM
1.9%
SPHB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPVM vs. SPHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPVM
SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPVM vs. SPHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPVMSPHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.43

5.90

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.80

22.17

-5.37

SPVM vs. SPHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the SPHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPVM and SPHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPVM vs. SPHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPVM drawdown since its inception was -45.35%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHB drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPVM and SPHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPVMSPHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.35%

-46.84%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-10.70%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

-29.21%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.48%

-31.49%

+12.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.35%

-46.84%

+1.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-4.02%

+3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-8.48%

+3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

2.84%

-1.11%

Volatility

SPVM vs. SPHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) is 3.27%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a volatility of 11.78%. This indicates that SPVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPVMSPHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

11.78%

-8.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

19.72%

-12.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.64%

24.30%

-12.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

27.73%

-10.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

28.54%

-8.98%

SPVM vs. SPHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPVM vs. SPHB - Dividend Comparison

SPVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than SPHB's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.54%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
2.02%2.02%1.91%2.45%2.33%1.41%2.11%2.40%3.10%1.68%2.80%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPVM and SPHB have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to SPVM (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPVM dropped -45.35% vs SPHB's -46.84%.

On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 19.46% vs 12.34% for SPVM. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 19.46% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.

SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.54% for SPHB.

SPVM is categorized as Momentum, while SPHB is S&P 500. SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, while SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SPVM and 0.25% for SPHB.

SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPVM and SPHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer