PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPVM vs. IMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPVM vs. IMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPVM achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than IMOM's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SPVM has outperformed IMOM with an annualized return of 12.38%, while IMOM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.32% annualized return.


SPVM

1D
0.31%
1M
2.93%
YTD
10.28%
6M
8.91%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
12.38%

IMOM

1D
-0.56%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
13.16%
6M
12.20%
1Y
34.06%
3Y*
23.08%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
7.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPVM vs. IMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
10.28%20.47%15.64%5.53%-2.10%28.86%-3.18%29.33%-9.17%14.70%
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
13.16%47.20%5.22%9.15%-21.92%-0.75%28.39%18.26%-23.07%34.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SPVM and IMOM is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.48

The correlation between SPVM and IMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPVM vs. IMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPVM
IMOM

Financial Services

36.0%
4.2%

Utilities

13.8%
10.7%

Energy

8.6%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
1.7%

Communication Services

6.6%
6.3%

Technology

6.2%
18.7%

Healthcare

6.2%
3.3%

Industrials

4.5%
31.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
14.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
4.2%

Financial Services

SPVM
36.0%
IMOM
4.2%

Utilities

SPVM
13.8%
IMOM
10.7%

Energy

SPVM
8.6%
IMOM
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPVM
7.6%
IMOM

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPVM
6.8%
IMOM
1.7%

Communication Services

SPVM
6.6%
IMOM
6.3%

Technology

SPVM
6.2%
IMOM
18.7%

Healthcare

SPVM
6.2%
IMOM
3.3%

Industrials

SPVM
4.5%
IMOM
31.2%

Basic Materials

SPVM
1.9%
IMOM
14.5%

Real Estate

SPVM
1.9%
IMOM
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPVM vs. IMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPVM
SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IMOM
IMOM Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPVM vs. IMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPVMIMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

2.19

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.50

8.72

+7.78

SPVM vs. IMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the IMOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPVM and IMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPVM vs. IMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPVM drawdown since its inception was -45.35%, roughly equal to the maximum IMOM drawdown of -45.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPVM and IMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPVMIMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.35%

-45.74%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-15.61%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

-17.51%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.48%

-39.27%

+19.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.35%

-45.74%

+0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-6.49%

+5.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-14.12%

+9.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

3.92%

-2.19%

Volatility

SPVM vs. IMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) is 3.14%, while Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that SPVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPVMIMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

8.36%

-5.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

18.21%

-10.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

20.71%

-9.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

20.06%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

20.28%

-0.73%

SPVM vs. IMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IMOM's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPVM vs. IMOM - Dividend Comparison

SPVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than IMOM's 2.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
2.23%2.53%4.52%2.95%6.06%1.27%0.59%1.17%0.78%1.11%0.54%0.00%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
2.01%2.02%1.91%2.45%2.33%1.41%2.11%2.40%3.10%1.68%2.80%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPVM and IMOM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMOM has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to SPVM (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPVM dropped -45.35% vs IMOM's -45.74%.

On 10-year performance, SPVM leads with 12.38% vs 7.32% for IMOM. On fees, IMOM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPVM has performed better with a 12.38% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMOM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.

IMOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 2.01% for SPVM.

SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, while IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SPVM and 0.38% for IMOM.

SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPVM and IMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer