PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPVM vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPVM vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPVM achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 15.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SPVM has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 11.89%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.


SPVM

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.16%
YTD
8.29%
6M
10.61%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
11.89%

SPHQ

1D
0.28%
1M
7.17%
YTD
15.48%
6M
16.06%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPVM vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
8.29%20.47%15.64%5.53%-2.10%28.86%-3.18%29.33%-9.17%14.70%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
15.48%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SPVM and SPHQ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2011

0.71

The correlation between SPVM and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPVM vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPVM
SPHQ

Financial Services

37.0%
13.3%

Utilities

14.2%
1.0%

Energy

8.7%
0.7%

Communication Services

6.6%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
4.6%

Healthcare

6.3%
8.4%

Technology

5.3%
28.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
15.4%

Industrials

4.4%
24.3%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.2%

Financial Services

SPVM
37.0%
SPHQ
13.3%

Utilities

SPVM
14.2%
SPHQ
1.0%

Energy

SPVM
8.7%
SPHQ
0.7%

Communication Services

SPVM
6.6%
SPHQ
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPVM
6.3%
SPHQ
4.6%

Healthcare

SPVM
6.3%
SPHQ
8.4%

Technology

SPVM
5.3%
SPHQ
28.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPVM
4.9%
SPHQ
15.4%

Industrials

SPVM
4.4%
SPHQ
24.3%

Real Estate

SPVM
1.9%
SPHQ

-

Basic Materials

SPVM
1.8%
SPHQ
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPVM vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPVM
SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPVM vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPVMSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

2.62

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.33

11.17

+5.16

SPVM vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPVM and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPVMSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.85

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.89

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.84

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.53

+0.09

Drawdowns

SPVM vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPVM drawdown since its inception was -45.35%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPVM and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPVMSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.35%

-57.83%

+12.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-8.90%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

-16.57%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.48%

-25.04%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.35%

-31.60%

-13.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

0.00%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-10.70%

+5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

2.08%

-0.36%

Volatility

SPVM vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) is 2.79%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that SPVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPVMSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

3.49%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

10.18%

-2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

12.62%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

16.45%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

17.86%

+1.71%

SPVM vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPVM vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

SPVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.04%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
1.91%2.02%1.91%2.45%2.33%1.41%2.11%2.40%3.10%1.68%2.80%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPVM and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHQ has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to SPVM (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPVM dropped -45.35% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.01% vs 11.89% for SPVM. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.

SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.04% for SPHQ.

SPVM is categorized as Momentum, while SPHQ is S&P 500. SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SPVM and 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPVM and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer