PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SPUU vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SPUU vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 5, 2026
Documentation

SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. SPUU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SPUU charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

SPUU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUU achieves a 24.37% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 347.15% return.

SPUU

1D
3.48%
1M
6.81%
6M
22.20%
YTD
24.37%
1Y
42.90%
3Y*
36.19%
5Y*
18.90%
10Y*
24.28%
ALL TIME*
21.98%

LINT

1D
22.09%
1M
-34.82%
6M
182.15%
YTD
347.15%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

LINT

Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
$20.13M$20.02M$34.55M

SPUU

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
$5.02M$5.05M$4.57M

SPUU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF		24.37%6.38%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares		347.15%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUU and LINT is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.50

SPUU vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SPUU
LINT

Technology

17.0%
100.0%

Financial Services

5.5%

-

Communication Services

4.2%

-

Healthcare

4.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%

-

Industrials

3.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.1%

-

Energy

1.5%

-

Utilities

1.2%

-

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

0.8%

-

Technology

SPUU
17.0%
LINT
100.0%

Financial Services

SPUU
5.5%
LINT

-

Communication Services

SPUU
4.2%
LINT

-

Healthcare

SPUU
4.1%
LINT

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPUU
3.9%
LINT

-

Industrials

SPUU
3.5%
LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

SPUU
2.1%
LINT

-

Energy

SPUU
1.5%
LINT

-

Utilities

SPUU
1.2%
LINT

-

Real Estate

SPUU
0.9%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

SPUU
0.8%
LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF

Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares

Often compared with SPUU:
SPUU vs. SSOSPUU vs. SPYSPUU vs. SPXLSPUU vs. VOOSPUU vs. QLDSPUU vs. QQQSPUU vs. DDM
Often compared with LINT:
LINT vs. INTWLINT vs. SOXLLINT vs. YINNLINT vs. ARMGLINT vs. XXXXLINT vs. SPYQLINT vs. MSTU

Return for Risk

SPUU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPUU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SPUULINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.67

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.22

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.56

—

—

SPUU vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPUU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUU drawdown since its inception was -59.35%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUU and LINT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SPUULINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.35%

-69.02%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.18%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-53.88%

+53.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-24.24%

+14.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

—

—

Volatility

SPUU vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SPUULINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.18%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.79%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.00%

170.36%

-144.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.76%

170.36%

-136.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.82%

170.36%

-134.54%

SPUU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUU has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPUU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than LINT's 0.61% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares		0.61%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF		1.26%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

SPUU and LINT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.61% for LINT.

Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SPUU and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUU and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer