SPUU vs. IWDL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) and IWDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SPUU tracks the S&P 500 Index (200% Daily) while IWDL tracks the Russell 1000 Value (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPUU returned 18.44%/yr vs 14.46%/yr for IWDL. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPUU charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for IWDL.

Performance

SPUU vs. IWDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUU achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly lower than IWDL's 28.58% return.

SPUU

• 1D: -2.91%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 10.95%
• 1Y: 43.00%
• 3Y*: 34.33%
• 5Y*: 18.44%
• 10Y*: 24.81%

IWDL

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: 3.97%
• YTD: 28.58%
• 6M: 26.90%
• 1Y: 53.41%
• 3Y*: 29.95%
• 5Y*: 14.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUU vs. IWDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF	13.33%	26.55%	44.25%	47.28%	-38.72%	52.18%
IWDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN	28.58%	25.02%	20.68%	13.50%	-21.27%	40.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUU and IWDL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021	0.84

The correlation between SPUU and IWDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPUU vs. IWDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUU

SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 51
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 59

IWDL

IWDL Risk / Return Rank: 78
IWDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
IWDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
IWDL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IWDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
IWDL Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUU vs. IWDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPUU	IWDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	2.30	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	3.11	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.39	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	3.97	-1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.11	16.20	-6.09

SPUU vs. IWDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUU Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the IWDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUU and IWDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPUU vs. IWDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUU drawdown since its inception was -59.35%, which is greater than IWDL's maximum drawdown of -37.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUU and IWDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPUU	IWDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.35%	-37.95%	-21.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.19%	-13.53%	-4.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.18%	-31.78%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.59%	-37.95%	-8.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.62%	-2.12%	-4.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.48%	-10.50%	+1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.27%	3.31%	+0.96%

Volatility

SPUU vs. IWDL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) at 7.25%. This indicates that SPUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPUU	IWDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.70%	7.25%	+2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.93%	18.33%	+1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.22%	23.35%	+1.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.67%	30.33%	+3.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.81%	30.00%	+5.81%

SPUU vs. IWDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUU has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDL's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPUU vs. IWDL - Dividend Comparison

SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while IWDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF	1.42%	1.63%	0.55%	0.83%	0.88%	3.04%	8.03%	1.80%	5.50%	6.96%	8.08%	4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPUU and IWDL in my portfolio?

SPUU and IWDL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPUU or IWDL?

SPUU has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to IWDL (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUU dropped -59.35% vs IWDL's -37.95%.

Which ETF is better, SPUU or IWDL?

On 5-year performance, SPUU leads with 18.44% vs 14.46% for IWDL. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IWDL has been the lower-risk option at 7.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPUU or IWDL?

Over the 5-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 18.44% return vs 14.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPUU or IWDL?

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for IWDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPUU or IWDL?

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for IWDL.

What is the main difference between SPUU and IWDL?

SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily), while IWDL tracks Russell 1000 Value (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SPUU and 0.95% for IWDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.