IWDL vs. MVV
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV).
IWDL and MVV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWDL is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Value (200%). It was launched on Feb 5, 2021. MVV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both IWDL and MVV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IWDL vs. MVV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWDL vs. MVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN | 3.56% | 25.02% | 20.68% | 13.50% | -21.27% | 40.35% |
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 4.75% | 3.48% | 17.75% | 22.51% | -31.96% | 29.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWDL achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than MVV's 4.75% return.
IWDL
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 26.48%
- 3Y*
- 21.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- —
MVV
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWDL vs. MVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IWDL and MVV have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
IWDL vs. MVV — Risk / Return Rank
IWDL
MVV
IWDL vs. MVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWDL | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 0.57 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.09 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.15 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.97 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.01 | 3.72 | +1.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWDL | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.57 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.10 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.24 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWDL and MVV is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IWDL vs. MVV - Dividend Comparison
IWDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 0.81% | 0.77% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.17% |
Drawdowns
IWDL vs. MVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWDL drawdown since its inception was -37.95%, smaller than the maximum MVV drawdown of -85.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDL and MVV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWDL | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.95% | -85.54% | +47.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.92% | -26.85% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.95% | -45.53% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.63% | -11.34% | +2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -20.70% | +9.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.15% | 6.97% | -1.82% |
Volatility
IWDL vs. MVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) is 8.67%, while ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that IWDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWDL | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.67% | 12.99% | -4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.10% | 24.02% | -5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.75% | 43.30% | -9.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.32% | 39.66% | -9.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.24% | 42.32% | -12.08% |