SPUS vs. XXXX
SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) and XXXX (MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while XXXX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPUS returned 40.24% vs 86.73% for XXXX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPUS charges 0.45%/yr vs 2.95%/yr for XXXX.
Performance
SPUS vs. XXXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly lower than XXXX's 29.32% return.
SPUS
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 40.24%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- —
XXXX
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- 18.44%
- YTD
- 29.32%
- 6M
- 26.06%
- 1Y
- 86.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUS vs. XXXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 15.82% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 4.50% |
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 29.32% | 17.36% | 61.36% | 16.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUS and XXXX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SPUS and XXXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUS vs. XXXX — Risk / Return Rank
SPUS
XXXX
SPUS vs. XXXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPUS | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.86 | 1.86 | +0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.79 | 2.31 | +1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.30 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 2.34 | +1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.32 | 8.95 | +7.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPUS | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 1.86 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.87 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
SPUS vs. XXXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum XXXX drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and XXXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUS | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.80% | -62.27% | +31.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -37.25% | +26.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -2.88% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -11.60% | +5.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 9.73% | -7.26% |
Volatility
SPUS vs. XXXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) is 4.00%, while MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that SPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPUS | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 11.32% | -7.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.84% | 35.41% | -24.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.16% | 46.83% | -32.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 60.75% | -41.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 60.75% | -39.47% |
SPUS vs. XXXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPUS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XXXX's 2.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPUS vs. XXXX - Dividend Comparison
SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while XXXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.52% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% |
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SPUS and XXXX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XXXX has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to SPUS (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUS dropped -30.80% vs XXXX's -62.27%.
On 1-year performance, XXXX leads with 86.73% vs 40.24% for SPUS. On fees, SPUS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SPUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XXXX has performed better with a 86.73% return vs 40.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.
SPUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for XXXX.
SPUS is categorized as S&P 500, while XXXX is Leveraged Equities. SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while XXXX tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SPUS and 2.95% for XXXX.
SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPUS and XXXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer