PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUS vs. XXXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUS vs. XXXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly lower than XXXX's 29.32% return.


SPUS

1D
-0.86%
1M
9.49%
YTD
15.82%
6M
15.21%
1Y
40.24%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*

XXXX

1D
-2.88%
1M
18.44%
YTD
29.32%
6M
26.06%
1Y
86.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUS vs. XXXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
15.82%19.77%26.49%4.50%
XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
29.32%17.36%61.36%16.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUS and XXXX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023

0.95

The correlation between SPUS and XXXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUS vs. XXXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

XXXX
XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUS vs. XXXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPUSXXXXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.86

1.86

+0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.79

2.31

+1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.30

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

2.34

+1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.32

8.95

+7.37

SPUS vs. XXXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the XXXX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUS and XXXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPUSXXXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

1.86

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.87

+0.05

Drawdowns

SPUS vs. XXXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum XXXX drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and XXXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUSXXXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

-62.27%

+31.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-37.25%

+26.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-2.88%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-11.60%

+5.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

9.73%

-7.26%

Volatility

SPUS vs. XXXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) is 4.00%, while MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that SPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUSXXXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

11.32%

-7.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.84%

35.41%

-24.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.16%

46.83%

-32.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

60.75%

-41.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.28%

60.75%

-39.47%

SPUS vs. XXXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XXXX's 2.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUS vs. XXXX - Dividend Comparison

SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while XXXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.52%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%
XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SPUS and XXXX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XXXX has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to SPUS (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUS dropped -30.80% vs XXXX's -62.27%.

On 1-year performance, XXXX leads with 86.73% vs 40.24% for SPUS. On fees, SPUS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SPUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XXXX has performed better with a 86.73% return vs 40.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.

SPUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for XXXX.

SPUS is categorized as S&P 500, while XXXX is Leveraged Equities. SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while XXXX tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SPUS and 2.95% for XXXX.

SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUS and XXXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer