SPTU vs. SPYG
SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTU is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPTU charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
SPTU vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTU achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.75% return.
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 33.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
SPTU vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.75% | 1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTU and SPYG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTU vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
SPTU
SPYG
SPTU vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPTU | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 11.82 | 0.35 | +11.47 |
Drawdowns
SPTU vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTU drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTU and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTU | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -67.63% | +67.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.13% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -24.33% | +24.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.32% | — |
Volatility
SPTU vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTU | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32% | 16.06% | -15.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 21.17% | -20.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 20.64% | -20.32% |
SPTU vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTU has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPTU vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTU and SPYG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SPTU.
SPTU has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.
SPTU is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SPYG is S&P 500. SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPTU and 0.04% for SPYG.
Find the right allocation for SPTU and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer