SPTU vs. ASHS
SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) and ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTU is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while ASHS is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 500 Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. SPTU charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHS.
Performance
SPTU vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTU achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than ASHS's 15.10% return.
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASHS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 6M
- 23.90%
- 1Y
- 57.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 3.27%
SPTU vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 15.10% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTU and ASHS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTU vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank
SPTU
ASHS
SPTU vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPTU | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 11.82 | 0.19 | +11.63 |
Drawdowns
SPTU vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTU drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTU and ASHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTU | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -69.90% | +69.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -33.57% | +33.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -48.57% | +48.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.21% | — |
Volatility
SPTU vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTU | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32% | 22.59% | -22.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 26.46% | -26.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 25.57% | -25.25% |
SPTU vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTU has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPTU vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison
SPTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, while ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTU and ASHS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHS.
SPTU has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.00% for ASHS.
SPTU is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while ASHS is China Equities. SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index, while ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPTU and 0.65% for ASHS.
Find the right allocation for SPTU and ASHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer