PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPTS vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPTS vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTS achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SPTS has underperformed XLU with an annualized return of 1.67%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.


SPTS

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.77%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
1.81%
10Y*
1.67%

XLU

1D
-0.43%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
3.11%
6M
1.25%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTS vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
0.45%5.05%4.20%4.27%-3.86%-0.72%3.23%3.56%1.08%0.59%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.11%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTS and XLU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2011

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPTS vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTS
SPTS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SPTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTS vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPTSXLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.12

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

1.00

+3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.52

2.24

+14.29

SPTS vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTS Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTS and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPTSXLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

0.63

+2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.54

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.48

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.40

+0.09

Drawdowns

SPTS vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTS drawdown since its inception was -5.83%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTS and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPTSXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-51.98%

+46.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.84%

-9.18%

+8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.96%

-17.26%

+16.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.71%

-25.26%

+19.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.71%

-36.07%

+30.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-7.78%

+7.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-10.22%

+8.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

4.09%

-3.88%

Volatility

SPTS vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) is 0.34%, while State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that SPTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPTSXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

5.41%

-5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.86%

11.53%

-10.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32%

14.57%

-13.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.98%

17.32%

-15.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.72%

19.26%

-17.54%

SPTS vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTS has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPTS vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

SPTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than XLU's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
3.91%3.99%4.25%3.61%1.27%0.19%0.70%2.21%2.04%1.20%0.95%0.83%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.72%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPTS and XLU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLU has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SPTS (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTS dropped -5.83% vs XLU's -51.98%.

On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.15% vs 1.67% for SPTS. On fees, SPTS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTS has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.15% return vs 1.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLU.

SPTS has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.72% for XLU.

SPTS is categorized as Government Bonds, while XLU is Utilities Equities. SPTS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTS and 0.08% for XLU.

SPTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPTS and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer