SPTS vs. XLE
SPTS (SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTS is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPTS returned 1.67%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for XLE. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. SPTS charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
SPTS vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTS achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SPTS has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 1.67%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.
SPTS
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.67%
XLE
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 32.17%
- 6M
- 29.80%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 20.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
SPTS vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTS SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | 0.45% | 5.05% | 4.20% | 4.27% | -3.86% | -0.72% | 3.23% | 3.56% | 1.08% | 0.59% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 32.17% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTS and XLE is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2011 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTS vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
SPTS
XLE
SPTS vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPTS | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.35 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 3.75 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.52 | 10.92 | +5.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPTS | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.21 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.79 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 | 0.35 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.31 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
SPTS vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTS drawdown since its inception was -5.83%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTS and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTS | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -71.26% | +65.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.84% | -12.05% | +11.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.96% | -20.14% | +19.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.71% | -26.04% | +20.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.71% | -66.81% | +61.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -6.15% | +5.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -17.98% | +16.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.21% | 4.14% | -3.93% |
Volatility
SPTS vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) is 0.34%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that SPTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTS | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.34% | 8.25% | -7.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.86% | 16.58% | -15.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32% | 20.53% | -19.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 26.02% | -24.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.72% | 29.59% | -27.87% |
SPTS vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTS has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPTS vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
SPTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than XLE's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTS SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 3.99% | 4.25% | 3.61% | 1.27% | 0.19% | 0.70% | 2.21% | 2.04% | 1.20% | 0.95% | 0.83% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.54% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTS and XLE have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to SPTS (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTS dropped -5.83% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 10.22% vs 1.67% for SPTS. On fees, SPTS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTS has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 1.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.
SPTS has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.54% for XLE.
SPTS is categorized as Government Bonds, while XLE is Energy Equities. SPTS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTS and 0.08% for XLE.
SPTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPTS and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer