SPTM vs. SPYD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) and SPYD (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Composite 1500 Index, while SPYD is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPTM returned 15.21%/yr vs 8.59%/yr for SPYD. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPTM charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SPYD.

Performance

SPTM vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTM achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than SPYD's 10.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SPTM has outperformed SPYD with an annualized return of 15.21%, while SPYD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.59% annualized return.

SPTM

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.87%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 27.84%
• 3Y*: 21.90%
• 5Y*: 13.38%
• 10Y*: 15.21%

SPYD

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 10.34%
• 6M: 10.97%
• 1Y: 16.38%
• 3Y*: 14.37%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: 8.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTM vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	11.10%	16.93%	23.87%	25.55%	-17.75%	28.58%	17.94%	31.34%	-5.30%	21.18%
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF	10.34%	4.65%	15.34%	3.91%	-1.17%	32.73%	-11.64%	21.20%	-4.89%	12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTM and SPYD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2015	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between SPTM and SPYD has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPTM vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPTM	SPYD
Technology	34.0%	2.7%
Financial Services	12.1%	12.1%
Communication Services	10.5%	5.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	6.5%
Industrials	9.4%	2.3%
Healthcare	8.6%	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	16.3%
Energy	3.7%	9.2%
Utilities	2.3%	11.4%
Real Estate	2.3%	25.8%
Basic Materials	2.0%	3.4%

Return for Risk

SPTM vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

SPYD

SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 41
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 36
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTM vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPTM	SPYD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	1.42	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	2.15	+1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.24	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	2.33	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.01	6.77	+8.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPTM vs. SPYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTM Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the SPYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTM and SPYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPTM	SPYD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	1.42	+0.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.42	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	0.44	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.47	-0.01

Drawdowns

SPTM vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTM drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, which is greater than SPYD's maximum drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTM and SPYD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPTM	SPYD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.80%	-46.42%	-8.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-7.05%	-1.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.87%	-16.13%	-2.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.14%	-22.25%	-1.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.66%	-46.42%	+11.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-1.11%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.05%	-6.17%	-2.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	2.43%	-0.57%

Volatility

SPTM vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) at 2.57%. This indicates that SPTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPTM	SPYD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	2.57%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.92%	7.71%	+1.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.88%	11.62%	+0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.87%	16.13%	+0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	19.78%	-1.75%

SPTM vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPTM vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison

SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than SPYD's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF	4.21%	4.52%	4.31%	4.66%	5.01%	3.68%	4.95%	4.42%	4.75%	4.63%	4.34%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPTM and SPYD in my portfolio?

SPTM and SPYD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPTM or SPYD?

SPTM has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to SPYD (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTM dropped -54.80% vs SPYD's -46.42%.

Which ETF is better, SPTM or SPYD?

On 10-year performance, SPTM leads with 15.21% vs 8.59% for SPYD. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPTM or SPYD?

Over the 10-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 8.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPTM or SPYD?

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SPYD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPTM or SPYD?

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 1.04% for SPTM.

What is the main difference between SPTM and SPYD?

SPTM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPYD is S&P 500. SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTM and 0.07% for SPYD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.