PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPTM vs. SPYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPTM vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTM achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly lower than SPYD's 16.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SPTM has outperformed SPYD with an annualized return of 14.86%, while SPYD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.85% annualized return.


SPTM

1D
0.62%
1M
0.21%
6M
8.81%
YTD
10.61%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
14.86%
ALL TIME*
8.78%

SPYD

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.23%
6M
11.71%
YTD
16.95%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
8.85%
ALL TIME*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$40.04M$39.69M$45.49M
$48.08M$45.65M$55.32M

SPTM vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
10.61%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%17.94%31.34%-5.30%21.18%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
16.95%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-11.64%21.20%-4.89%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTM and SPYD is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2015

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between SPTM and SPYD has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPTM vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPTM
SPYD

Technology

36.3%
2.7%

Financial Services

12.5%
12.6%

Healthcare

9.3%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
6.4%

Industrials

8.8%
2.5%

Communication Services

8.7%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
14.6%

Energy

3.5%
8.9%

Utilities

2.6%
11.6%

Real Estate

2.3%
26.5%

Basic Materials

2.2%
3.7%

Technology

SPTM
36.3%
SPYD
2.7%

Financial Services

SPTM
12.5%
SPYD
12.6%

Healthcare

SPTM
9.3%
SPYD
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPTM
9.1%
SPYD
6.4%

Industrials

SPTM
8.8%
SPYD
2.5%

Communication Services

SPTM
8.7%
SPYD
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPTM
4.5%
SPYD
14.6%

Energy

SPTM
3.5%
SPYD
8.9%

Utilities

SPTM
2.6%
SPYD
11.6%

Real Estate

SPTM
2.3%
SPYD
26.5%

Basic Materials

SPTM
2.2%
SPYD
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPTM vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPTM vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPTMSPYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.01

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.07

8.94

+1.13

SPTM vs. SPYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the SPYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTM and SPYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPTM vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTM drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, which is greater than SPYD's maximum drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTM and SPYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPTMSPYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.80%

-46.42%

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-7.05%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.87%

-16.13%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-22.25%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

-46.42%

+11.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-2.06%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-6.09%

-2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.37%

-0.38%

Volatility

SPTM vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) is 3.50%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that SPTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPTMSPYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

4.00%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

8.41%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

11.94%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

15.98%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

19.77%

-1.74%

SPTM vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPTM vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison

SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than SPYD's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.06%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
4.10%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPTM and SPYD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYD has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to SPTM (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTM dropped -54.80% vs SPYD's -46.42%.

On 10-year performance, SPTM leads with 14.86% vs 8.85% for SPYD. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SPYD.

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 1.06% for SPTM.

SPTM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPYD is S&P 500. SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTM and 0.07% for SPYD.

SPYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPTM and SPYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer