SPTM vs. SCHK
SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index while SCHK tracks the Schwab 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPTM returned 12.72%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for SCHK. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
SPTM vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPTM having a 8.72% return and SCHK slightly lower at 8.54%.
SPTM
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
SCHK
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 8.72% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -17.75% | 28.58% | 17.94% | 31.34% | -5.30% | 5.32% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 8.54% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 26.17% | 20.75% | 31.31% | -5.09% | 5.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTM and SCHK is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SPTM and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPTM vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPTM
SCHK
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
SPTM
SCHK
Financial Services
SPTM
SCHK
Consumer Cyclical
SPTM
SCHK
Communication Services
SPTM
SCHK
Industrials
SPTM
SCHK
Healthcare
SPTM
SCHK
Consumer Defensive
SPTM
SCHK
Energy
SPTM
SCHK
Real Estate
SPTM
SCHK
Utilities
SPTM
SCHK
Basic Materials
SPTM
SCHK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTM vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
SPTM
SCHK
SPTM vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPTM | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 2.65 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.49 | 11.81 | +0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPTM vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTM drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, which is greater than SCHK's maximum drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTM and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTM | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.80% | -34.80% | -20.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -8.97% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.87% | -19.21% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.14% | -25.44% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -2.98% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.03% | -5.16% | -3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.01% | -0.09% |
Volatility
SPTM vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) have volatilities of 4.79% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTM | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 4.96% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 10.10% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.51% | 12.84% | -0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 17.34% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 19.12% | -1.08% |
SPTM vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPTM and SCHK have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPTM vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than SCHK's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.08% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SPTM and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHK has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to SPTM (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTM dropped -54.80% vs SCHK's -34.80%.
On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 12.72% vs 12.31% for SCHK. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM and SCHK have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 1.03% for SCHK.
SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index, while SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPTM and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer