SPTM vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Composite 1500 Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPTM returned 13.38%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPTM charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

SPTM vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTM achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.00% return.

SPTM

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.87%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 27.84%
• 3Y*: 21.90%
• 5Y*: 13.38%
• 10Y*: 15.21%

GLDM

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 3.00%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: 31.49%
• 5Y*: 18.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTM vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	11.10%	16.93%	23.87%	25.55%	-17.75%	28.58%	17.94%	31.34%	-8.39%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	3.00%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTM and GLDM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018	0.08

The correlation between SPTM and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPTM vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPTM	GLDM
Technology	34.0%	-
Financial Services	12.1%	-
Communication Services	10.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	-
Industrials	9.4%	-
Healthcare	8.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	-
Energy	3.7%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Basic Materials	2.0%	100.0%

Return for Risk

SPTM vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 32
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTM vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPTM	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	1.24	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	1.63	+1.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.25	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	1.70	+1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.01	4.23	+10.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPTM vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTM Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTM and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPTM	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	1.24	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	1.04	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	1.02	-0.56

Drawdowns

SPTM vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTM drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTM and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPTM	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.80%	-21.63%	-33.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-19.14%	+10.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.87%	-19.14%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.14%	-20.92%	-3.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-17.65%	+16.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.05%	-6.22%	-2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	7.69%	-5.83%

Volatility

SPTM vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) is 2.88%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that SPTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPTM	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	5.47%	-2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.92%	22.99%	-14.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.88%	26.39%	-14.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.87%	17.91%	-1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	16.85%	+1.18%

SPTM vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPTM vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPTM and GLDM in my portfolio?

SPTM and GLDM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPTM or GLDM?

GLDM has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to SPTM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTM dropped -54.80% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

Which ETF is better, SPTM or GLDM?

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 13.38% for SPTM. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPTM or GLDM?

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 13.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPTM or GLDM?

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPTM or GLDM?

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

What is the main difference between SPTM and GLDM?

SPTM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GLDM is Gold. SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTM and 0.10% for GLDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.