SPTM vs. ACVF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) and ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SPTM is passively managed, while ACVF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPTM returned 13.38%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for ACVF. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPTM charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACVF.

Performance

SPTM vs. ACVF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPTM having a 11.10% return and ACVF slightly lower at 10.58%.

SPTM

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.87%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 27.84%
• 3Y*: 21.90%
• 5Y*: 13.38%
• 10Y*: 15.21%

ACVF

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 6.32%
• YTD: 10.58%
• 6M: 11.23%
• 1Y: 20.30%
• 3Y*: 19.62%
• 5Y*: 12.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTM vs. ACVF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	11.10%	16.93%	23.87%	25.55%	-17.75%	28.58%	14.48%
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	10.58%	13.67%	20.56%	23.81%	-15.74%	28.84%	13.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTM and ACVF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020	0.96

The correlation between SPTM and ACVF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPTM vs. ACVF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPTM	ACVF
Technology	34.0%	39.7%
Financial Services	12.1%	11.6%
Communication Services	10.5%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	10.7%
Industrials	9.4%	11.0%
Healthcare	8.6%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	5.9%
Energy	3.7%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.2%
Real Estate	2.3%	1.7%
Basic Materials	2.0%	1.6%

Return for Risk

SPTM vs. ACVF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

ACVF

ACVF Risk / Return Rank: 54
ACVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ACVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ACVF Omega Ratio Rank: 50
ACVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
ACVF Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTM vs. ACVF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPTM	ACVF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	1.79	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	2.53	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.32	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	2.65	+0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.01	10.75	+4.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPTM vs. ACVF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTM Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the ACVF Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTM and ACVF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPTM	ACVF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	1.79	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.77	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	1.02	-0.56

Drawdowns

SPTM vs. ACVF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTM drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, which is greater than ACVF's maximum drawdown of -24.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTM and ACVF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPTM	ACVF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.80%	-24.39%	-30.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-7.70%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.87%	-16.82%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.14%	-24.39%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.53%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.05%	-4.75%	-4.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	1.89%	-0.03%

Volatility

SPTM vs. ACVF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) is 2.88%, while American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that SPTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACVF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPTM	ACVF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	3.06%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.92%	9.00%	-0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.88%	11.41%	+0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.87%	16.23%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	15.97%	+2.06%

SPTM vs. ACVF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ACVF's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPTM vs. ACVF - Dividend Comparison

SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than ACVF's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	0.53%	0.59%	0.59%	0.82%	0.93%	0.61%	0.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPTM and ACVF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, SPTM and ACVF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPTM or ACVF?

ACVF has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to SPTM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTM dropped -54.80% vs ACVF's -24.39%.

Which ETF is better, SPTM or ACVF?

On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 13.38% vs 12.39% for ACVF. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPTM or ACVF?

Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPTM or ACVF?

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACVF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPTM or ACVF?

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.53% for ACVF.

What is the main difference between SPTM and ACVF?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Ridgeline Research LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTM and 0.75% for ACVF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.