SPTI vs. TLT
SPTI (SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - SPTI tracks the Bloomberg 3-10 Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index while TLT tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPTI returned 1.33%/yr vs -1.66%/yr for TLT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPTI charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
SPTI vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTI achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than TLT's -0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SPTI has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 1.33%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.66% annualized return.
SPTI
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 6M
- -0.57%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.33%
TLT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -6.31%
- 10Y*
- -1.66%
SPTI vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTI SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF | -0.41% | 7.46% | 1.32% | 4.24% | -10.65% | -2.55% | 7.70% | 6.01% | 2.27% | 1.04% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.27% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTI and TLT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SPTI and TLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTI vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
SPTI
TLT
SPTI vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF (SPTI) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPTI | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.51 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 0.80 | +0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.09 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 0.65 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | 1.63 | +2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPTI | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.51 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | -0.40 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | -0.11 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.26 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
SPTI vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTI drawdown since its inception was -16.12%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTI and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTI | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.12% | -48.35% | +32.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -7.58% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.35% | -19.18% | +14.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.06% | -43.70% | +28.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.12% | -48.35% | +32.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -40.44% | +38.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -13.82% | +10.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 3.04% | -2.11% |
Volatility
SPTI vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF (SPTI) is 1.05%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that SPTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTI | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 2.76% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 6.50% | -4.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.41% | 9.77% | -6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 15.87% | -10.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.37% | 14.91% | -10.54% |
SPTI vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTI has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPTI vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
SPTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTI SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF | 3.86% | 3.79% | 3.77% | 2.99% | 1.45% | 0.53% | 0.75% | 2.02% | 1.97% | 1.46% | 1.23% | 1.18% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.59% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTI and TLT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLT has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to SPTI (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTI dropped -16.12% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 10-year performance, SPTI leads with 1.33% vs -1.66% for TLT. On fees, SPTI is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SPTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPTI has performed better with a 1.33% return vs -1.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTI is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLT.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 3.86% for SPTI.
SPTI tracks Bloomberg 3-10 Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SPTI and 0.15% for TLT.
SPTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPTI and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer