SPSM vs. MTUM
SPSM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPSM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPSM returned 11.30%/yr vs 17.15%/yr for MTUM. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPSM charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
SPSM vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 29.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SPSM has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 11.30%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.15% annualized return.
SPSM
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 16.52%
- 1Y
- 37.11%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 29.72%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 42.02%
- 3Y*
- 33.16%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.15%
SPSM vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 19.73% | 6.11% | 8.55% | 16.11% | -16.12% | 26.67% | 11.69% | 25.85% | -11.17% | 15.44% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 29.72% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPSM and MTUM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SPSM and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPSM vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPSM
MTUM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
SPSM
MTUM
Industrials
SPSM
MTUM
Technology
SPSM
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
SPSM
MTUM
Healthcare
SPSM
MTUM
Real Estate
SPSM
MTUM
Energy
SPSM
MTUM
Basic Materials
SPSM
MTUM
Communication Services
SPSM
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
SPSM
MTUM
Utilities
SPSM
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPSM vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
SPSM
MTUM
SPSM vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPSM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 3.55 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.39 | 13.66 | -0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPSM vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPSM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.89% | -34.08% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | -11.54% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.94% | -20.99% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.94% | -32.28% | +4.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.89% | -34.08% | -8.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.55% | +1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -6.20% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.99% | -0.40% |
Volatility
SPSM vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) is 5.14%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that SPSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPSM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 10.89% | -5.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 18.63% | -6.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.69% | 20.87% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 20.94% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 21.20% | +1.80% |
SPSM vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPSM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPSM vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than MTUM's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.61% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 1.37% | 1.62% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPSM and MTUM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to SPSM (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.15% vs 11.30% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.15% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.
SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.61% for MTUM.
SPSM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPSM and 0.15% for MTUM.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPSM and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer