PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPSM vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPSM vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 29.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SPSM has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 11.30%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.15% annualized return.


SPSM

1D
0.99%
1M
5.61%
YTD
19.73%
6M
16.52%
1Y
37.11%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
11.30%

MTUM

1D
1.69%
1M
5.58%
YTD
29.72%
6M
30.51%
1Y
42.02%
3Y*
33.16%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
17.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPSM vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
19.73%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%26.67%11.69%25.85%-11.17%15.44%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
29.72%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SPSM and MTUM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013

0.66

The correlation between SPSM and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPSM vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPSM
MTUM

Financial Services

16.9%
10.4%

Industrials

15.5%
15.6%

Technology

15.5%
44.4%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
3.6%

Healthcare

11.0%
6.9%

Real Estate

7.7%
1.8%

Energy

5.9%
3.5%

Basic Materials

5.1%
1.7%

Communication Services

3.6%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
3.3%

Utilities

2.0%
1.6%

Financial Services

SPSM
16.9%
MTUM
10.4%

Industrials

SPSM
15.5%
MTUM
15.6%

Technology

SPSM
15.5%
MTUM
44.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPSM
13.4%
MTUM
3.6%

Healthcare

SPSM
11.0%
MTUM
6.9%

Real Estate

SPSM
7.7%
MTUM
1.8%

Energy

SPSM
5.9%
MTUM
3.5%

Basic Materials

SPSM
5.1%
MTUM
1.7%

Communication Services

SPSM
3.6%
MTUM
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPSM
3.5%
MTUM
3.3%

Utilities

SPSM
2.0%
MTUM
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPSM vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPSM vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPSMMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

3.55

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.39

13.66

-0.27

SPSM vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPSM and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPSM vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPSMMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.89%

-34.08%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-11.54%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.94%

-20.99%

-6.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

-32.28%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

-34.08%

-8.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.55%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-6.20%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.99%

-0.40%

Volatility

SPSM vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) is 5.14%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that SPSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPSMMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

10.89%

-5.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

18.63%

-6.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.69%

20.87%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.45%

20.94%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.00%

21.20%

+1.80%

SPSM vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPSM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPSM vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than MTUM's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.61%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.37%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPSM and MTUM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to SPSM (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.15% vs 11.30% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.15% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.61% for MTUM.

SPSM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPSM and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPSM and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer