SPSM vs. ASCE
SPSM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SPSM is passively managed, while ASCE is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPSM charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.
Performance
SPSM vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 22.25% return.
SPSM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
ASCE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 22.25%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPSM vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 15.28% | 8.21% |
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 22.25% | 8.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPSM and ASCE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPSM vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank
SPSM
ASCE
SPSM vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPSM | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPSM | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.92 | -1.46 |
Drawdowns
SPSM vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and ASCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPSM | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.89% | -9.22% | -33.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -0.38% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -2.10% | -5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | — | — |
Volatility
SPSM vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPSM | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.47% | 19.25% | -1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 19.25% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 19.25% | +3.74% |
SPSM vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPSM has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPSM vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison
SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than ASCE's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 0.18% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 1.43% | 1.62% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPSM and ASCE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPSM is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ASCE.
SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPSM and 0.38% for ASCE.
Find the right allocation for SPSM and ASCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer