SPSM vs. ASCE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SPSM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SPSM is passively managed, while ASCE is actively managed. Over the past year, SPSM returned 38.23% vs 43.18% for ASCE. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SPSM charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.

Performance

SPSM vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 23.56% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 29.71% return.

SPSM

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 15.76%
• YTD: 23.56%
• 1Y: 38.23%
• 3Y*: 14.54%
• 5Y*: 8.14%
• 10Y*: 10.87%
• ALL TIME*: 10.18%

ASCE

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: 1.84%
• 6M: 22.15%
• YTD: 29.71%
• 1Y: 43.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 37.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	$5.35M	$3.61M	$2.13M
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF	$90.04M	$96.96M	$95.31M

SPSM vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF	23.56%	9.11%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	29.71%	8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SPSM and ASCE is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.87

The correlation between SPSM and ASCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPSM vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPSM

SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 90
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 91

ASCE

ASCE Risk / Return Rank: 86
ASCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ASCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ASCE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ASCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ASCE Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPSM vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPSM	ASCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.17	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.12	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.36	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	4.71	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.10	14.18	+0.92

SPSM vs. ASCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the ASCE Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPSM and ASCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPSM vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and ASCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPSM	ASCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.89%	-9.22%	-33.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.72%	-9.22%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-1.19%	+0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.84%	-2.11%	-5.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	3.05%	-0.51%

Volatility

SPSM vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) is 3.75%, while Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that SPSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPSM	ASCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	5.78%	-2.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.70%	15.28%	-3.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.24%	19.99%	-2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.29%	19.68%	+1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.95%	19.68%	+3.27%

SPSM vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPSM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPSM vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than ASCE's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.17%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF	1.37%	1.62%	1.85%	1.61%	1.38%	1.40%	1.34%	1.58%	1.82%	1.51%	1.49%	2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPSM and ASCE in my portfolio?

SPSM and ASCE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPSM or ASCE?

ASCE has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to SPSM (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs ASCE's -9.22%.

Which ETF is better, SPSM or ASCE?

On 1-year performance, ASCE leads with 43.18% vs 38.23% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPSM or ASCE?

Over the 1-year period, ASCE has performed better with a 43.18% return vs 38.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPSM or ASCE?

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ASCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPSM or ASCE?

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.17% for ASCE.

What is the main difference between SPSM and ASCE?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPSM and 0.38% for ASCE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.