SPSB vs. SLQD
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPSB) and iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD).
SPSB and SLQD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPSB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. 1-3 Year Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. SLQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index. It was launched on Oct 15, 2013. Both SPSB and SLQD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPSB or SLQD.
Performance
SPSB vs. SLQD - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPSB having a 4.60% return and SLQD slightly lower at 4.38%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPSB having a 2.14% annualized return and SLQD not far ahead at 2.22%.
SPSB
4.60%
-0.23%
3.37%
6.67%
2.14%
2.14%
SLQD
4.38%
-0.36%
3.30%
6.79%
2.05%
2.22%
Key characteristics
| SPSB | SLQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.83 | 3.47 |
| Sortino Ratio | 6.47 | 5.75 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.88 | 1.76 |
| Calmar Ratio | 10.99 | 3.78 |
| Martin Ratio | 29.83 | 23.09 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.23% | 0.31% |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.81% | 2.03% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.75% | -12.69% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.53% | -0.68% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPSB vs. SLQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPSB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SLQD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between SPSB and SLQD is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPSB vs. SLQD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPSB) and iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPSB vs. SLQD - Dividend Comparison
SPSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than SLQD's 3.60% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPSB SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.85% | 4.05% | 1.92% | 1.20% | 1.94% | 2.77% | 2.36% | 1.94% | 1.65% | 1.44% | 1.26% | 1.41% |
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 3.60% | 2.99% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.34% | 2.89% | 2.56% | 1.98% | 1.81% | 1.43% | 1.24% | 0.23% |
Drawdowns
SPSB vs. SLQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPSB drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, smaller than the maximum SLQD drawdown of -12.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSB and SLQD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPSB vs. SLQD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPSB) is 0.38%, while iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) has a volatility of 0.54%. This indicates that SPSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.