PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPSB vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPSB vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPSB) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPSB achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 10.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SPSB has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 2.63%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.15% annualized return.


SPSB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.34%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
2.63%

RSP

1D
0.91%
1M
3.92%
YTD
10.96%
6M
10.34%
1Y
21.34%
3Y*
14.66%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPSB vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPSB
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
1.01%5.86%5.25%5.60%-3.31%-0.20%3.83%5.21%1.45%1.58%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
10.96%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SPSB and RSP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2009

0.09

Over the past year, SPSB and RSP have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPSB vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPSB
SPSB Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SPSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPSB vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPSB) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPSBRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.29

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.94

2.54

+2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.91

9.63

+13.28

SPSB vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPSB Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPSB and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPSB vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPSB drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSB and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPSBRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-59.92%

+48.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.87%

-7.85%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.87%

-17.81%

+16.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.96%

-21.38%

+15.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.75%

-39.04%

+27.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-6.64%

+6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

2.07%

-1.88%

Volatility

SPSB vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPSB) is 0.38%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that SPSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPSBRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

3.57%

-3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.95%

8.59%

-7.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33%

11.83%

-10.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.99%

16.22%

-14.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.06%

18.36%

-15.30%

SPSB vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPSB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPSB vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

SPSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than RSP's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.47%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%
SPSB
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.40%4.55%4.85%4.05%1.92%1.19%1.94%2.77%2.36%1.94%1.65%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPSB and RSP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSP has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to SPSB (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSB dropped -11.75% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 12.15% vs 2.63% for SPSB. On fees, SPSB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 12.15% return vs 2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.

SPSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 1.47% for RSP.

SPSB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while RSP is S&P 500. SPSB tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. 1-3 Year Corporate Bond Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPSB and 0.20% for RSP.

SPSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPSB and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer