SPPP vs. ALB
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB).
SPPP is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Dec 19, 2012.
Performance
SPPP vs. ALB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPPP vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | -7.78% | 89.43% | -11.89% | -25.86% | -2.37% | -21.77% | 23.84% | 46.00% | 5.53% | 35.36% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 27.24% | 67.72% | -39.50% | -32.80% | -6.63% | 59.76% | 105.39% | -3.28% | -38.89% | 50.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPPP achieves a -7.78% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's 27.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SPPP has underperformed ALB with an annualized return of 9.27%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.
SPPP
- 1D
- 4.93%
- 1M
- -18.00%
- YTD
- -7.78%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 56.24%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
ALB
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 27.24%
- 6M
- 122.64%
- 1Y
- 153.65%
- 3Y*
- -5.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPPP vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank
SPPP
ALB
SPPP vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPPP | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 2.39 | -1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 2.63 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 5.15 | -3.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.81 | 12.66 | -7.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPPP | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 2.39 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.09 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.26 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.31 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPPP and ALB is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SPPP vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison
SPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 0.90% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
SPPP vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPPP drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, smaller than the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP and ALB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPPP | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.09% | -83.90% | +24.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.42% | -29.74% | -7.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.09% | -83.90% | +24.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.09% | -83.90% | +24.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.22% | -42.07% | +10.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.42% | -20.55% | -5.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.30% | 12.09% | +0.21% |
Volatility
SPPP vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB) have volatilities of 16.95% and 16.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPPP | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.95% | 16.32% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.40% | 43.64% | +2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.39% | 64.79% | -15.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.38% | 53.87% | -19.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.88% | 47.65% | -14.77% |