SPOG vs. CIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPOG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while CIL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. SPOG is actively managed, while CIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. SPOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

SPOG vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPOG achieves a -41.52% return, which is significantly lower than CIL's 5.44% return.

SPOG

• 1D: -5.23%
• 1M: 19.81%
• YTD: -41.52%
• 6M: -37.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 7.94%
• 1Y: 17.37%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPOG vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPOG Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF	-41.52%	-19.53%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SPOG and CIL is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

SPOG vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 76
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPOG vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPOG	CIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.73	0.43	-1.16

Drawdowns

SPOG vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPOG drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than CIL's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPOG	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.41%	-36.27%	-28.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.60%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.96%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.94%	-0.58%	-52.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.43%	-6.56%	-33.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPOG	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.23%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.84%	8.19%	+95.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	103.84%	16.49%	+87.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	103.84%	17.17%	+86.67%

SPOG vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPOG vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

SPOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.67%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
SPOG Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPOG and CIL in my portfolio?

SPOG and CIL have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPOG or CIL?

On fees, CIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPOG or CIL?

CIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SPOG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPOG or CIL?

CIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for SPOG.

What is the main difference between SPOG and CIL?

SPOG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CIL is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SPOG and 0.45% for CIL.