PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPOG vs. ASMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPOG vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPOG achieves a -44.50% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 67.22% return.


SPOG

1D
0.02%
1M
-1.59%
6M
-32.94%
YTD
-44.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASMH

1D
-3.49%
1M
-5.48%
6M
39.03%
YTD
67.22%
1Y
124.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPOG vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF
-44.50%-18.73%
ASMH
ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF
67.22%5.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SPOG and ASMH is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPOG vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPOG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ASMH
ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPOG vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPOGASMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.45

SPOG vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPOG vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPOG drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG and ASMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPOGASMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-15.89%

-48.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.34%

-12.71%

-42.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.60%

-4.35%

-38.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.44%

Volatility

SPOG vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPOGASMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.83%

43.76%

+54.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.83%

41.32%

+56.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.83%

41.32%

+56.51%

SPOG vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPOG vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

SPOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPOG and ASMH have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SPOG.

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for SPOG.

SPOG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ASMH is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SPOG and 0.19% for ASMH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPOG and ASMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer