SPOG vs. ASMH
SPOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPOG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while ASMH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. SPOG is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. SPOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.
Performance
SPOG vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPOG achieves a -44.50% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 67.22% return.
SPOG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -32.94%
- YTD
- -44.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASMH
- 1D
- -3.49%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- 6M
- 39.03%
- YTD
- 67.22%
- 1Y
- 124.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPOG vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPOG Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF | -44.50% | -18.73% |
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 67.22% | 5.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPOG and ASMH is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPOG vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank
SPOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ASMH
SPOG vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPOG | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPOG vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPOG drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG and ASMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPOG | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -15.89% | -48.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.34% | -12.71% | -42.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.60% | -4.35% | -38.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.44% | — |
Volatility
SPOG vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPOG | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.83% | 43.76% | +54.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.83% | 41.32% | +56.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.83% | 41.32% | +56.51% |
SPOG vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPOG vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison
SPOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 1.67% | 0.19% |
SPOG Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPOG and ASMH have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SPOG.
ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for SPOG.
SPOG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ASMH is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SPOG and 0.19% for ASMH.
Find the right allocation for SPOG and ASMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer