SPMV vs. XLG
SPMV (Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from Invesco - SPMV tracks the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index while XLG tracks the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
SPMV vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPMV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLG
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 8.03%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 28.88%
- 3Y*
- 24.70%
- 5Y*
- 16.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.28%
SPMV vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMV Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF | 0.87% | 11.69% | 18.78% | 10.28% | -10.84% | 24.35% | 8.57% | 32.13% | -6.28% | 7.84% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 8.03% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 10.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMV and XLG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPMV and XLG has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPMV vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMV
XLG
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMV
XLG
Financial Services
SPMV
XLG
Healthcare
SPMV
XLG
Consumer Defensive
SPMV
XLG
Consumer Cyclical
SPMV
XLG
Communication Services
SPMV
XLG
Industrials
SPMV
XLG
Energy
SPMV
XLG
Utilities
SPMV
XLG
-
Basic Materials
SPMV
XLG
Real Estate
SPMV
XLG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMV vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
SPMV
XLG
SPMV vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPMV | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.63 | — |
Drawdowns
SPMV vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMV | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -52.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.02% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.64% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.30% | — |
Volatility
SPMV vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMV | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 13.32% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 18.68% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 18.84% | — |
SPMV vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPMV vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
SPMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMV Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF | 1.45% | 1.53% | 1.53% | 2.28% | 1.79% | 1.28% | 1.71% | 3.13% | 2.11% | 1.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMV and XLG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.
SPMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.
SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SPMV and 0.20% for XLG.
Find the right allocation for SPMV and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer