PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMV vs. XLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMV vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPMV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLG

1D
0.42%
1M
4.19%
YTD
8.03%
6M
7.64%
1Y
28.88%
3Y*
24.70%
5Y*
16.34%
10Y*
17.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMV vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
0.87%11.69%18.78%10.28%-10.84%24.35%8.57%32.13%-6.28%7.84%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
8.03%19.51%33.49%38.16%-24.29%30.77%24.15%32.04%-3.59%10.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMV and XLG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between SPMV and XLG has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPMV vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMV
XLG

Technology

26.9%
43.9%

Financial Services

17.8%
9.6%

Healthcare

15.0%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

10.7%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
11.3%

Communication Services

6.5%
17.1%

Industrials

6.0%
1.9%

Energy

4.8%
2.7%

Utilities

2.8%

-

Basic Materials

2.6%
0.6%

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Technology

SPMV
26.9%
XLG
43.9%

Financial Services

SPMV
17.8%
XLG
9.6%

Healthcare

SPMV
15.0%
XLG
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPMV
10.7%
XLG
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPMV
6.6%
XLG
11.3%

Communication Services

SPMV
6.5%
XLG
17.1%

Industrials

SPMV
6.0%
XLG
1.9%

Energy

SPMV
4.8%
XLG
2.7%

Utilities

SPMV
2.8%
XLG

-

Basic Materials

SPMV
2.6%
XLG
0.6%

Real Estate

SPMV
0.2%
XLG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMV vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMV

XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMV vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPMV vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPMVXLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

Drawdowns

SPMV vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMVXLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

Volatility

SPMV vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMVXLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

SPMV vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMV vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

SPMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
1.45%1.53%1.53%2.28%1.79%1.28%1.71%3.13%2.11%1.72%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.60%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMV and XLG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

SPMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SPMV and 0.20% for XLG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMV and XLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer