PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. WRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. WRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than WRB's -2.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed WRB with an annualized return of 20.86%, while WRB has yielded a comparatively lower 17.92% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
1.26%
1M
3.36%
YTD
28.15%
6M
28.70%
1Y
44.90%
3Y*
41.53%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
20.86%

WRB

1D
1.08%
1M
2.74%
YTD
-2.51%
6M
0.17%
1Y
-4.36%
3Y*
24.41%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*
17.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. WRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.15%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
-2.51%23.02%27.19%0.25%33.92%27.39%-3.14%43.80%5.96%10.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and WRB is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.31

The correlation between SPMO and WRB shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. WRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

WRB
WRB Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
WRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRB Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
WRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. WRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMOWRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.98

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

-0.29

+3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

-0.54

+13.55

SPMO vs. WRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the WRB Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and WRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. WRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum WRB drawdown of -69.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and WRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOWRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-69.33%

+38.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-17.62%

+4.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-17.62%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-26.29%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-45.35%

+14.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-11.49%

+9.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-14.58%

+9.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

9.29%

-5.94%

Volatility

SPMO vs. WRB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) at 7.63%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOWRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

7.63%

+2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

15.08%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

21.37%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

22.83%

-3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

24.56%

-4.08%

Dividends

SPMO vs. WRB - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than WRB's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.67%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
2.72%2.64%2.39%2.73%1.22%2.44%0.71%2.43%2.83%2.16%2.27%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and WRB have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to WRB (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs WRB's -69.33%.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and WRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer