SPMO vs. WRB
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while WRB (W. R. Berkley Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.86%/yr vs 17.92%/yr for WRB. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SPMO vs. WRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than WRB's -2.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed WRB with an annualized return of 20.86%, while WRB has yielded a comparatively lower 17.92% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 44.90%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
WRB
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- -2.51%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- -4.36%
- 3Y*
- 24.41%
- 5Y*
- 17.90%
- 10Y*
- 17.92%
SPMO vs. WRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | -2.51% | 23.02% | 27.19% | 0.25% | 33.92% | 27.39% | -3.14% | 43.80% | 5.96% | 10.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and WRB is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.31 |
The correlation between SPMO and WRB shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. WRB — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
WRB
SPMO vs. WRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | WRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.98 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | -0.29 | +3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | -0.54 | +13.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. WRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum WRB drawdown of -69.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and WRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | WRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -69.33% | +38.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -17.62% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -17.62% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -26.29% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -45.35% | +14.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -11.49% | +9.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -14.58% | +9.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 9.29% | -5.94% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. WRB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) at 7.63%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | WRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 7.63% | +2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 15.08% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 21.37% | -1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 22.83% | -3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 24.56% | -4.08% |
Dividends
SPMO vs. WRB - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than WRB's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 2.72% | 2.64% | 2.39% | 2.73% | 1.22% | 2.44% | 0.71% | 2.43% | 2.83% | 2.16% | 2.27% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and WRB have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to WRB (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs WRB's -69.33%.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and WRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer