SPMO vs. PKB
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while PKB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.86%/yr vs 15.78%/yr for PKB. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PKB.
Performance
SPMO vs. PKB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than PKB's 14.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed PKB with an annualized return of 20.86%, while PKB has yielded a comparatively lower 15.78% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 43.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
PKB
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 34.86%
- 3Y*
- 27.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
SPMO vs. PKB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 14.33% | 22.47% | 20.24% | 55.29% | -24.88% | 32.96% | 24.49% | 40.15% | -31.11% | 24.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and PKB is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.56 |
The correlation between SPMO and PKB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPMO vs. PKB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
PKB
Technology
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMO
PKB
-
Industrials
SPMO
PKB
Communication Services
SPMO
PKB
-
Healthcare
SPMO
PKB
-
Financial Services
SPMO
PKB
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
PKB
-
Energy
SPMO
PKB
-
Utilities
SPMO
PKB
Basic Materials
SPMO
PKB
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
PKB
Real Estate
SPMO
PKB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. PKB — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
PKB
SPMO vs. PKB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.25 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 2.27 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 7.21 | +5.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. PKB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum PKB drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and PKB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -65.21% | +34.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -15.41% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -29.75% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -34.85% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -52.29% | +21.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -4.31% | +2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -15.75% | +11.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 4.86% | -1.51% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. PKB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) at 8.73%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PKB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 8.73% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 18.69% | -1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 23.78% | -4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 25.78% | -6.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 27.29% | -6.81% |
SPMO vs. PKB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than PKB's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. PKB - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than PKB's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and PKB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to PKB (8.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs PKB's -65.21%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 15.78% for PKB. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, PKB has been the lower-risk option at 8.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 15.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.14% for PKB.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while PKB is Building & Construction. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.60% for PKB.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and PKB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer