SPMO vs. HDV
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.17%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for HDV. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
SPMO vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 27.25% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 19.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 20.17%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.60% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 4.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 27.03%
- YTD
- 27.25%
- 1Y
- 32.27%
- 3Y*
- 39.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.99%
- 10Y*
- 20.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.45%
HDV
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- YTD
- 19.95%
- 1Y
- 24.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $176.49M | $158.01M | $110.76M | |
| $336.43M | $343.89M | $352.54M |
SPMO vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 27.25% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 19.95% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and HDV is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.43 |
The correlation between SPMO and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPMO vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
HDV
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMO
HDV
Industrials
SPMO
HDV
Communication Services
SPMO
HDV
Healthcare
SPMO
HDV
Financial Services
SPMO
HDV
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
HDV
Energy
SPMO
HDV
Utilities
SPMO
HDV
Basic Materials
SPMO
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
HDV
Real Estate
SPMO
HDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
HDV
SPMO vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.40 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 4.80 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.44 | 13.10 | -5.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -37.04% | +6.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.64% | -5.18% | -10.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -10.49% | -9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -15.42% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -37.04% | +6.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.49% | -1.48% | -5.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -3.06% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 1.89% | +2.46% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.95% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 4.30%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.95% | 4.30% | +6.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.85% | 8.66% | +13.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.13% | 10.81% | +13.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 12.94% | +7.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 15.79% | +5.18% |
SPMO vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPMO vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than HDV's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.07% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.69% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and HDV have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to HDV (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.17% vs 9.60% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.17% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.69% for SPMO.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while HDV is Dividend. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer