PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. CRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. CRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly lower than CRS's 78.53% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has underperformed CRS with an annualized return of 20.86%, while CRS has yielded a comparatively higher 35.01% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
1.26%
1M
6.27%
YTD
28.15%
6M
28.70%
1Y
44.90%
3Y*
41.53%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
20.86%

CRS

1D
-0.17%
1M
37.31%
YTD
78.53%
6M
74.76%
1Y
126.36%
3Y*
121.69%
5Y*
68.28%
10Y*
35.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. CRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.15%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
78.53%86.23%141.72%94.48%29.50%2.66%-39.44%42.12%-29.16%43.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and CRS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. CRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CRS
CRS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRS Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. CRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMOCRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

6.68

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

15.72

-2.71

SPMO vs. CRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the CRS Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and CRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. CRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum CRS drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and CRS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOCRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-84.68%

+53.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-19.08%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-28.74%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-41.86%

+19.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-74.70%

+43.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-0.17%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-27.23%

+22.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

8.09%

-4.74%

Volatility

SPMO vs. CRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 10.29%, while Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOCRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

12.83%

-2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

33.92%

-17.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

48.29%

-28.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

46.70%

-27.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

48.88%

-28.40%

Dividends

SPMO vs. CRS - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than CRS's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
0.14%0.25%0.47%1.13%2.17%2.74%2.75%1.61%2.13%1.41%1.99%2.38%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.67%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and CRS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRS has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs CRS's -84.68%.

CRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and CRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer